Katz D A
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53705, USA.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):377-89.
To describe common barriers that limit the effect of guidelines on patient care, with emphasis on recommendations for triage in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline.
Previously reported results from a prospective clinical study of 10,785 patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia.
Design is an analysis of the AHCPR guideline with regard to recognized barriers in guideline implementation. Presentation of hypothetical scenarios to ED physicians was used to determine interrater reliability in applying the guideline to assess risk and to make triage decisions.
The AHCPR guideline's triage recommendations demonstrate (1) poor interobserver reliability in interpretation by ED physicians; (2) limited applicability of recommendations for outpatient management (applies to 6 percent of patients presenting to the ED with unstable angina); (3) incomplete specifications of exceptions that may require deviation from guideline recommendations; (4) unexpected effects on medical care by significantly increasing the demand for limited intensive care beds; and (5) unknown effects on patient outcomes. In addition, analysis of the guideline highlights the need to address organizational barriers, such as administrative policies that conflict with guideline recommendations and the need to adapt the guideline to conform to local systems of care.
Careful analysis of guideline attributes, projected effect on medical care, and organizational factors reveal several barriers to successful guideline implementation that should be addressed in the design of future guideline-based interventions.
描述限制指南对患者护理效果的常见障碍,重点关注医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)不稳定型心绞痛临床实践指南中的分诊建议。
先前一项对10785名因急性心脏缺血症状就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者进行的前瞻性临床研究报告的结果。
设计内容是对AHCPR指南在指南实施中公认障碍方面的分析。向急诊科医生呈现假设情景,以确定在应用指南评估风险和做出分诊决策方面的评分者间信度。
AHCPR指南的分诊建议显示出:(1)急诊科医生在解读时观察者间信度较差;(2)门诊管理建议的适用性有限(适用于6%因不稳定型心绞痛就诊于急诊科的患者);(3)可能需要偏离指南建议的例外情况的说明不完整;(4)通过显著增加对有限重症监护床位的需求对医疗护理产生意外影响;(5)对患者结局的影响未知。此外,对该指南的分析突出了应对组织障碍的必要性,如与指南建议相冲突的行政政策以及使指南适应当地护理系统的必要性。
对指南属性、对医疗护理的预期影响以及组织因素进行仔细分析,揭示了成功实施指南的几个障碍,这些障碍应在未来基于指南的干预措施设计中加以解决。