Suppr超能文献

指南与改善患者护理之间的障碍:对美国医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)不稳定型心绞痛临床实践指南的分析。美国医疗保健政策与研究机构

Barriers between guidelines and improved patient care: an analysis of AHCPR's Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

作者信息

Katz D A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53705, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):377-89.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe common barriers that limit the effect of guidelines on patient care, with emphasis on recommendations for triage in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline.

DATA SOURCES

Previously reported results from a prospective clinical study of 10,785 patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia.

STUDY DESIGN

Design is an analysis of the AHCPR guideline with regard to recognized barriers in guideline implementation. Presentation of hypothetical scenarios to ED physicians was used to determine interrater reliability in applying the guideline to assess risk and to make triage decisions.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The AHCPR guideline's triage recommendations demonstrate (1) poor interobserver reliability in interpretation by ED physicians; (2) limited applicability of recommendations for outpatient management (applies to 6 percent of patients presenting to the ED with unstable angina); (3) incomplete specifications of exceptions that may require deviation from guideline recommendations; (4) unexpected effects on medical care by significantly increasing the demand for limited intensive care beds; and (5) unknown effects on patient outcomes. In addition, analysis of the guideline highlights the need to address organizational barriers, such as administrative policies that conflict with guideline recommendations and the need to adapt the guideline to conform to local systems of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful analysis of guideline attributes, projected effect on medical care, and organizational factors reveal several barriers to successful guideline implementation that should be addressed in the design of future guideline-based interventions.

摘要

目的

描述限制指南对患者护理效果的常见障碍,重点关注医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)不稳定型心绞痛临床实践指南中的分诊建议。

数据来源

先前一项对10785名因急性心脏缺血症状就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者进行的前瞻性临床研究报告的结果。

研究设计

设计内容是对AHCPR指南在指南实施中公认障碍方面的分析。向急诊科医生呈现假设情景,以确定在应用指南评估风险和做出分诊决策方面的评分者间信度。

主要发现

AHCPR指南的分诊建议显示出:(1)急诊科医生在解读时观察者间信度较差;(2)门诊管理建议的适用性有限(适用于6%因不稳定型心绞痛就诊于急诊科的患者);(3)可能需要偏离指南建议的例外情况的说明不完整;(4)通过显著增加对有限重症监护床位的需求对医疗护理产生意外影响;(5)对患者结局的影响未知。此外,对该指南的分析突出了应对组织障碍的必要性,如与指南建议相冲突的行政政策以及使指南适应当地护理系统的必要性。

结论

对指南属性、对医疗护理的预期影响以及组织因素进行仔细分析,揭示了成功实施指南的几个障碍,这些障碍应在未来基于指南的干预措施设计中加以解决。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.制定和实施临床实践指南。
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验