Calabresi P, Centonze D, Marfia G A, Pisani A, Bernardi G
Dip. Sanità, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Br J Pharmacol. 1999 Feb;126(3):689-96. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702361.
We performed intracellular recordings from a rat corticostriatal slice preparation in order to compare the electrophysiological effects of the classical antiepileptic drug (AED) phenytoin (PHT) and the new AEDs lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP) on striatal neurons. PHT, LTG and GBP affected neither the resting membrane potential nor the input resistance/membrane conductance of the recorded cells. In contrast, these agents depressed in a dose-dependent and reversible manner the current-evoked repetitive firing discharge. These AEDs also reduced the amplitude of glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) evoked by cortical stimulation. However, substantial pharmacological differences between these drugs were found. PHT was the most effective and potent agent in reducing sustained repetitive firing of action potentials, whereas LTG and GBP preferentially inhibited corticostriatal excitatory transmission. Concentrations of LTG and GBP effective in reducing EPSPs, in fact, produced only a slight inhibition of the firing activity of these cells. LTG, but not PHT and GBP, depressed cortically-evoked EPSPs increasing paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) of synaptic transmission, suggesting that a presynaptic site of action was implicated in the effect of this drug. Accordingly, PHT and GBP, but not LTG reduced the membrane depolarizations induced by exogenously-applied glutamate, suggesting that these drugs preferentially reduce postsynaptic sensitivity to glutamate released from corticostriatal terminals. These data indicate that in the striatum PHT, LTG and GBP decrease neuronal excitability by modulating multiple sites of action. The preferential modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission may represent the cellular substrate for the therapeutic effects of new AEDs whose use may be potentially extended to the therapy of neurodegenerative diseases involving the basal ganglia.
我们从大鼠皮质纹状体脑片制备物中进行细胞内记录,以比较经典抗癫痫药物(AED)苯妥英(PHT)以及新型AEDs拉莫三嗪(LTG)和加巴喷丁(GBP)对纹状体神经元的电生理作用。PHT、LTG和GBP既不影响记录细胞的静息膜电位,也不影响输入电阻/膜电导。相反,这些药物以剂量依赖性和可逆的方式抑制电流诱发的重复放电。这些AEDs还降低了皮质刺激诱发的谷氨酸能兴奋性突触后电位(EPSPs)的幅度。然而,发现这些药物之间存在显著的药理学差异。PHT是减少动作电位持续重复放电最有效和最具效力的药物,而LTG和GBP优先抑制皮质纹状体兴奋性传递。事实上,有效降低EPSPs的LTG和GBP浓度仅对这些细胞的放电活动产生轻微抑制。LTG,但不是PHT和GBP,降低皮质诱发的EPSPs并增加突触传递的双脉冲易化(PPF),表明该药物的作用涉及突触前位点。因此,PHT和GBP,但不是LTG,减少了外源性应用谷氨酸诱导的膜去极化,表明这些药物优先降低对皮质纹状体终末释放的谷氨酸的突触后敏感性。这些数据表明,在纹状体中,PHT、LTG和GBP通过调节多个作用位点来降低神经元兴奋性。兴奋性突触传递的优先调节可能代表了新型AEDs治疗作用的细胞基础,其应用可能潜在地扩展到涉及基底神经节的神经退行性疾病的治疗。