Suppr超能文献

内镜检查在消化不良管理中的有效性:一项定性系统评价

The effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia: a qualitative systematic review.

作者信息

Ofman J J, Rabeneck L

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Health Services Research, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1999 Mar;106(3):335-46. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00016-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Dyspepsia is a common primary care condition, yet its optimal management is poorly defined. We reviewed the literature to answer the following questions about patients with dyspepsia: 1) Does endoscopy result in improved patient outcomes? 2) Does endoscopy result in a reduction in the use of subsequent medical resources? 3) Does endoscopy result in improved medical decision making? 4) Is endoscopy cost effective?

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of English-language articles in the MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, and EMBASE computerized bibliographic databases from January 1985 to July 1998. We included all studies, including decision analyses, with information about the effectiveness of endoscopy, as measured by its impact on patient outcomes, resource utilization, clinical decision making, or cost effectiveness. Two independent reviewers abstracted data from each study, and assessed its methodologic quality.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. For 3 of the 4 clinical questions, the weight of evidence does not support the effectiveness of endoscopy. The largest randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopy with empiric therapy demonstrates equivalent symptoms and quality of life at 1 year, with increased patient satisfaction and lower costs for initial endoscopy. Suboptimal study design, including lack of appropriate comparison groups, limit studies measuring the impact of endoscopy on resource utilization and decision-making. Decision analyses indicate that noninvasive H pylori testing followed by anti-H pylori therapy or empiric antisecretory therapy is more cost effective than initial endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of one randomized clinical trial, the preponderance of available data does not support the effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia. Prospective clinical trials that evaluate patient outcomes and resource utilization, and take H pylori status into account, are needed to determine the effectiveness of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia.

摘要

目的

消化不良是基层医疗中常见的病症,但其最佳治疗方案尚未明确界定。我们回顾了相关文献,以回答以下关于消化不良患者的问题:1)内镜检查能否改善患者预后?2)内镜检查能否减少后续医疗资源的使用?3)内镜检查能否改善医疗决策?4)内镜检查是否具有成本效益?

方法

我们对1985年1月至1998年7月MEDLINE、HEALTHSTAR和EMBASE计算机化书目数据库中的英文文章进行了系统综述。我们纳入了所有研究,包括决策分析,这些研究包含有关内镜检查有效性的信息,通过其对患者预后、资源利用、临床决策或成本效益的影响来衡量。两名独立审阅者从每项研究中提取数据,并评估其方法学质量。

结果

21项研究符合纳入标准。对于4个临床问题中的3个,现有证据不支持内镜检查的有效性。比较内镜检查与经验性治疗的最大规模随机临床试验表明,1年后症状和生活质量相当,初始内镜检查的患者满意度更高且成本更低。研究设计欠佳,包括缺乏合适的对照组,限制了衡量内镜检查对资源利用和决策影响的研究。决策分析表明,先进行非侵入性幽门螺杆菌检测,然后进行抗幽门螺杆菌治疗或经验性抗分泌治疗比初始内镜检查更具成本效益。

结论

除一项随机临床试验外,现有数据大多不支持内镜检查在消化不良管理中的有效性。需要进行前瞻性临床试验来评估患者预后和资源利用,并考虑幽门螺杆菌状态,以确定内镜检查在消化不良管理中的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验