• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Critical care in the Philippines: the "Robin Hood Principle" vs. Kagandahang loob.

作者信息

de Castro L D, Sy P A

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):563-80. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.563.2556.

DOI:10.1076/jmep.23.6.563.2556
PMID:10190841
Abstract

Practical medical decisions are closely integrated with ethical and religious beliefs in the Philippines. This is shown in a survey of Filipino physicians' attitudes towards severely compromised neonates. This is also the reason why the ethical analysis of critical care practices must be situated within the context of local culture. Kagandahang loob and kusang loob are indigenous Filipino ethical concepts that provide a framework for the analysis of several critical care practices. The practice of taking-from-the-rich-to-give-to-the-poor in public hospitals is not compatible with these concepts. The legislated definition of death and other aspects of the Philippine Law on Organ Transplants also fail to be compatible with these concepts. Many ethical issues that arise in a critical care setting have their roots outside the seemingly isolated clinical setting. Critical care need not apply only to individuals in a serious clinical condition. Vulnerable populations require critical attention because potent threats to their lives exist in the water that they drink and the air that they breathe. We cannot ignore these threats even as we move inevitably towards a technologically dependent, highly commercialized approach to health management.

摘要

相似文献

1
Critical care in the Philippines: the "Robin Hood Principle" vs. Kagandahang loob.
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):563-80. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.563.2556.
2
A transcultural, preventive ethics approach to critical-care medicine: restoring the critical care physician's power and authority.
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):628-42. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.628.2559.
3
Thailand: refining cultural values.泰国:提炼文化价值观。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Mar-Apr;20(2):25-7.
4
Ethical challenges in critical care medicine: a Chinese perspective.重症医学中的伦理挑战:中国视角
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):581-600. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.581.2558.
5
Critical care ethics in Asia: global or local?亚洲的重症监护伦理:全球的还是本土的?
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):549-62. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.547.2562.
6
Critical care: why there is no global bioethics.重症监护:为何不存在全球生物伦理学。
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):643-51. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.643.2555.
7
Catholic consensus on critical cae, patient welfare and the common good.天主教关于重症护理、患者福祉和共同利益的共识。
Christ Bioeth. 2001 Aug;7(2):185-92. doi: 10.1076/chbi.7.2.185.3752.
8
Consensus on critical care.重症监护共识。
Christ Bioeth. 2001 Aug;7(2):227-31. doi: 10.1076/chbi.7.2.227.3758.
9
Limiting access to medical treatment in an age of medical progress: developing a Catholic consensus: a response from Jewish tradition.在医学进步的时代限制医疗服务的可及性:形成天主教的共识:来自犹太传统的回应
Christ Bioeth. 2001 Aug;7(2):193-201. doi: 10.1076/chbi.7.2.193.3748.
10
The Catholic witness in a post-Christendom era.后基督教时代的天主教见证。
Christ Bioeth. 2001 Aug;7(2):233-7. doi: 10.1076/chbi.7.2.233.3754.