Ensor T
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Apr;48(7):871-9. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00389-x.
Many European and Asian economies are currently undergoing a process of economic transition away from state based command systems to market led economies. The impact of transition, such as a decline in public expenditure, break up of state enterprises and economic recession, has affected levels of funding available for social sectors. In the health sector, health insurance is being introduced as a way of alleviating the decline in funding arising from these processes. Most of the Former Soviet Union and a number of other Asian transition economies are currently introducing, extending or considering payroll based systems of health insurance. Comparisons with many Latin American countries, where social security based insurance has been encouraged since the first World War, can be illuminating. Experience suggests that, various factors have impeded or permitted development in these countries. General processes of economic change (transition factors) tend to affect all economies attempting to change the basis for public funding of services. Structural factors, such as urbanisation and the level of state or industrial employment, act as longer term inhibitors to the extension of coverage. These factors vary considerably across transition economies. This suggests that while a social security base for insurance may be a viable option for smaller industrialised European transitional economies, this is not the case for many of larger less industrialised economies. It is unclear how insurance will develop in the future. If a separate insurance fund is maintained it is important that its' purchasing function is developed. Otherwise it is not clear what value is added to the current health system. If entitlement is to be based on contribution, with the fund based on geographic or employment groups, systems for ensuring access for those not in employment and not classified as socially protected must be developed.
许多欧洲和亚洲经济体目前正经历着从基于国家指令体系的经济向市场主导型经济的转型过程。转型带来的影响,如公共支出下降、国有企业解体和经济衰退,已影响到社会部门可获得的资金水平。在卫生部门,引入医疗保险是缓解这些过程导致的资金下降的一种方式。大多数前苏联国家和一些其他亚洲转型经济体目前正在引入、扩大或考虑基于工资的医疗保险制度。与许多拉丁美洲国家进行比较可能会有启发,自第一次世界大战以来,拉丁美洲国家一直在鼓励基于社会保障的保险。经验表明,各种因素阻碍或促进了这些国家的发展。经济变革的一般过程(转型因素)往往会影响所有试图改变公共服务资金基础的经济体。城市化以及国家或工业就业水平等结构因素,对扩大保险覆盖范围起到了长期的抑制作用。这些因素在转型经济体中差异很大。这表明,虽然基于社会保障的保险对较小的工业化欧洲转型经济体可能是一个可行的选择,但对许多较大的欠工业化经济体来说并非如此。未来保险将如何发展尚不清楚。如果维持一个单独的保险基金,重要的是要发展其购买功能。否则,不清楚它为当前卫生系统增加了什么价值。如果权利基于缴款,基金基于地理或就业群体,那么必须建立确保非就业人员和未被归类为社会受保护人员获得保险的制度。