Dickson N, Paul C, Herbison P
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Dec;74(6):445-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.6.445.
To investigate among young people the relation between the number of sexual partners and use of medical services in order to guide planning of sexually transmitted disease screening.
Cross sectional study within a birth cohort using a questionnaire presented by computer.
Dunedin, New Zealand in 1993-4.
477 men and 458 women aged 21 enrolled in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, comprising 91.7% of survivors of the cohort.
Men with multiple sexual partners in the previous year were less likely to have a general practitioner than men with one or no partners (76.2% v 88.5%, p < 0.01). Among the women the respective proportions (83.1% and 88.4%) were not significantly different. Significantly more women than men (75.8% v 50.7%, p = 0.03) with five or more partners in the previous year had visited their own general practitioner over that period. Among the sexually experienced, more women than men attended any setting appropriate for sexually transmitted disease screening (93.6% v 71.6%, p < 0.001).
In New Zealand a screening programme for sexually transmitted diseases among young adults reliant on invitation by their own general practitioner would be biased towards those at less risk. Opportunistic screening in general practice would potentially include only about half the most sexually active men and three quarters of such women over a 12 month period. The extension of opportunistic screening to other settings considered appropriate for discussion of sexual health issues could potentially engage the vast majority of women, but not men, at most risk. Any screening programme should incorporate an effective method of finding and treating the sexual partners of infected women.
调查年轻人性伴侣数量与医疗服务利用之间的关系,以指导性传播疾病筛查计划的制定。
在一个出生队列中进行横断面研究,使用计算机呈现的问卷。
1993 - 1994年在新西兰达尼丁。
477名男性和458名21岁的女性参与了达尼丁多学科健康与发展研究,占该队列幸存者的91.7%。
前一年有多个性伴侣的男性比有一个或没有性伴侣的男性看全科医生的可能性更小(76.2%对88.5%,p<0.01)。在女性中,相应比例(83.1%和88.4%)无显著差异。前一年有五个或更多性伴侣的女性比男性(75.8%对50.7%,p = 0.03)在那段时间看自己的全科医生的比例显著更高。在有性经历的人群中,看适合性传播疾病筛查的医疗机构的女性比男性更多(93.6%对71.6%,p<0.001)。
在新西兰,依赖全科医生邀请进行的针对年轻人的性传播疾病筛查计划会偏向风险较低的人群。在全科医疗中进行机会性筛查在12个月期间可能仅涵盖约一半性活动最频繁的男性和四分之三此类女性。将机会性筛查扩展到其他被认为适合讨论性健康问题的场所可能会使绝大多数有最高风险的女性(而非男性)参与进来。任何筛查计划都应纳入一种有效的方法来查找和治疗感染女性的性伴侣。