Gold M
Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC 20224, USA.
Milbank Q. 1999;77(1):3-37, iii. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00123.
The "managed care backlash" arguably topped the list of media and policy concerns in 1998. Yet, against the background of the highly charged environment in which the future of our health care system continues to be debated, there is a dearth of concrete, "objective" facts on the nature of the changes, the reasons for them, and their meaning. An analysis of five important themes that emerged from a review of the recent literature on health system change concludes that an inherent tension exists between the interest in rapidly driving down health care costs through organizational change and the long time frames that are required to make fundamental changes in structure, process, and orientation. Unfortunately, in an environment in which purchasers are driven to seek cost savings and the political will supports a pluralistic and mixed public/private system, the health system may chart an alternative course, with the result that purchasers may rely increasingly on individual cost sharing and continue to cut back the amount of coverage they are willing to offer. The real challenge for public policy makers is to confront the issues directly, avoiding political incentives to adopt easy and fast solutions for these complex matters.
“管理式医疗的强烈抵制”可以说是1998年媒体和政策关注的首要问题。然而,在围绕我们医疗保健系统未来的激烈辩论环境背景下,关于这些变化的性质、原因及其意义,缺乏具体的“客观”事实。对近期有关卫生系统变革的文献综述中出现的五个重要主题进行分析后得出结论:通过组织变革迅速降低医疗保健成本的兴趣与在结构、流程和方向上进行根本性变革所需的长时间框架之间存在内在矛盾。不幸的是,在购买者被驱使寻求成本节约且政治意愿支持多元化和公私混合体系的环境中,卫生系统可能会选择另一条道路,结果可能是购买者越来越依赖个人成本分担,并继续削减他们愿意提供的保险金额。公共政策制定者面临的真正挑战是直接面对这些问题,避免出于政治动机而采用针对这些复杂问题的简单快速解决方案。