Escarce J J, Kapur K, Joyce G F, Van Vorst K A
RAND Health Program, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 1):1037-57.
To compare expenditures for medical care in a closed-panel gatekeeper HMO and an open-panel point-of-service (POS) plan that share the same provider network.
DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: The two study HMOs are distinct product lines of a single managed care organization; both plans are commercial products. We used administrative data files from the study plans for 1994-95 to assess differences in total medical care expenditures and spending for five categories of services: physician services, inpatient hospital services, outpatient hospital services, prescription drugs, and other services.
Multivariate analyses were based on the two-part model of the demand for medical care. The dependent variables in these models were expenditures in each of the five categories of services, and the independent variables were indicator variables for plan type and visit copayments, prescription drug copayment, distance to the nearest primary care physician (PCP), demographic characteristics, chronic conditions, area characteristics, and entry/exit indicator variables.
Total expenditures for medical care ranged from equal in both plans to 7 percent higher in the gatekeeper HMO (p < .10), depending on the copayments for physician visits. Expenditures were not higher in the POS plan for any of the five categories of services. These findings were robust to a wide range of sensitivity analyses.
Direct patient access to specialists in POS plans does not necessarily result in higher medical care expenditures. When POS enrollees are required to choose PCPs, patient cost sharing, physician financial incentives, and utilization review may control expenditures without constraining direct patient access to providers.
比较在拥有相同医疗服务提供网络的封闭式守门人健康维护组织(HMO)和开放式服务点(POS)计划中的医疗保健支出。
数据来源/研究背景:这两个研究性HMO是单一管理式医疗组织的不同产品线;这两种计划均为商业产品。我们使用了1994 - 1995年研究计划的管理数据文件,以评估五类服务的总医疗保健支出和费用差异:医生服务、住院医院服务、门诊医院服务、处方药和其他服务。
多变量分析基于医疗保健需求的两部分模型。这些模型中的因变量是五类服务中每类的支出,自变量是计划类型、就诊自付费用、处方药自付费用、到最近初级保健医生(PCP)的距离、人口统计学特征、慢性病、地区特征以及进出指标变量的指示变量。
根据医生就诊的自付费用情况,医疗保健总支出在两种计划中相等至守门人HMO中高出7%(p < 0.10)不等。在POS计划中,五类服务中的任何一类支出都没有更高。这些发现对广泛的敏感性分析具有稳健性。
在POS计划中患者直接看专科医生并不一定会导致更高的医疗保健支出。当要求POS参保人选择初级保健医生时,患者费用分担、医生经济激励措施和利用审查可以在不限制患者直接就医的情况下控制支出。