Cashion S W, Vann W F, Rozier R G, Venezie R D, McIver F T
MCH Training Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Pediatr Dent. 1999 Mar-Apr;21(2):97-103.
To characterize the patterns of dental care in the North Carolina (NC) Medicaid Program for three- and eight-year-old children who began dental treatment in the 1985-86 and 1990-91 groups. We also compared the children's patterns of care by provider (general dentists versus pediatric dentists).
Our extensive data set included claims, enrollment, and provider data. Children were assigned to one of five categories or patterns of care as follows: complete care, general anesthesia care, sporadic care, emergency only care, and no care. Statistical comparisons of the variables age, cohort year, and provider groups were made.
The use of Medicaid dental services by both age groups was severely limited in both yearly cohorts. Pediatric dentists tended to provide more complete and less sporadic care for both age groups and both yearly cohorts.
Financing dental care through Medicaid results in very low levels of complete care among enrollees, and any plan that limits referral to pediatric dentists might adversely affect the number of enrollees who receive complete care.
描述北卡罗来纳州(NC)医疗补助计划中1985 - 86年组和1990 - 91年组开始接受牙科治疗的三岁和八岁儿童的牙科护理模式。我们还比较了按提供者(普通牙医与儿科牙医)划分的儿童护理模式。
我们广泛的数据集包括理赔、注册和提供者数据。儿童被分为以下五种护理类别或模式之一:全面护理、全身麻醉护理、零星护理、仅急诊护理和无护理。对年龄、队列年份和提供者组等变量进行了统计比较。
在两个年度队列中,两个年龄组对医疗补助牙科服务的使用都受到严重限制。儿科牙医倾向于为两个年龄组和两个年度队列提供更全面且零星护理更少的服务。
通过医疗补助计划为牙科护理提供资金导致参保者获得全面护理的水平非常低,并且任何限制转诊至儿科牙医的计划可能会对获得全面护理的参保者数量产生不利影响。