Utter A C, Nieman D C, Ward A N, Butterworth D E
Department of Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;69(4):603-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.4.603.
There is little information on whether bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) accurately predicts changes in body composition associated with energy restriction, exercise, or both.
We had 2 objectives: to determine the validity of the leg-to-leg BIA system in 1) estimating body composition in obese and nonobese women, with a cross-sectional design, and 2) assessing changes in body composition in obese women in response to 12 wk of energy restriction, exercise training, or both.
Subjects were 98 moderately obese women (43.2 +/- 0.6% body fat, 45.0 +/- 1.1 y of age) and 27 nonobese control subjects (24.0 +/- 1.5% body fat, 43.5 +/- 2.5 y of age). Obese subjects were randomly divided into 1 of 4 groups, with fat-free mass, fat mass, and percentage body fat estimated with BIA and underwater weighing before and after 12 wk of intervention. The 4 groups were diet only (4.19-5.44 MJ/d), exercise only (five, 45-min sessions/wk at 78.5 +/- 0.5% of maximum heart rate), both exercise and diet, and control (no diet or exercise).
No significant difference was found between underwater weighing and BIA in estimating the fat-free mass of the obese and nonobese women (all subjects combined, r = 0.78, P < 0.001, SEE = 3.7 kg) or in estimating decreases in fat mass during 12 wk of energy restriction, exercise, or both in obese subjects (F[3.85] = 1.45, P = 0.233).
The leg-to-leg BIA system accurately assessed fat-free mass in obese and nonobese women, and changes in fat mass with diet alone or when combined with exercise.
关于生物电阻抗分析(BIA)能否准确预测与能量限制、运动或两者相关的身体成分变化的信息很少。
我们有两个目标:1)采用横断面设计,确定双腿BIA系统在估计肥胖和非肥胖女性身体成分方面的有效性;2)评估肥胖女性在接受12周能量限制、运动训练或两者结合后身体成分的变化。
受试者包括98名中度肥胖女性(体脂率43.2±0.6%,年龄45.0±1.1岁)和27名非肥胖对照受试者(体脂率24.0±1.5%,年龄43.5±2.5岁)。肥胖受试者被随机分为4组中的1组,在12周干预前后,通过BIA和水下称重法估计瘦体重、脂肪量和体脂百分比。这4组分别是仅节食组(4.19 - 5.44兆焦/天)、仅运动组(每周5次,每次45分钟,运动强度为最大心率的78.5±0.5%)、运动加节食组和对照组(不节食或运动)。
在估计肥胖和非肥胖女性的瘦体重方面(所有受试者合并计算,r = 0.78,P < 0.001,估计标准误差 = 3.7千克),以及在估计肥胖受试者在12周能量限制、运动或两者结合期间脂肪量的减少方面,水下称重法和BIA之间未发现显著差异(F[3.85] = 1.45,P = 0.233)。
双腿BIA系统能够准确评估肥胖和非肥胖女性的瘦体重,以及单独节食或节食与运动结合时脂肪量的变化。