Helgeson V S, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J
Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;56(4):340-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.340.
We report a clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of education-based and peer discussion-based group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer.
Women with stage I, II, or III breast cancer (n = 312) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 group conditions: control, education, peer discussion, or education plus peer discussion (combination). Seven groups (each comprising 8-12 women) were conducted in each of the 4 conditions (28 groups total). Adjustment was measured before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention.
Consistently positive effects on adjustment were seen in the education groups both immediately following and 6 months after the intervention. There were no benefits of participation in peer discussion groups, and some indications of adverse effects on adjustment at both follow-up examinations. The effects could be explained by changes in self-esteem, body image, and intrusive thoughts about the illness.
Education-based group interventions facilitated the initial adjustment of women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. There was no evidence of benefits from peer discussion group interventions.
我们报告了一项临床试验,比较基于教育和基于同伴讨论的小组干预措施对乳腺癌适应情况的有效性。
患有I期、II期或III期乳腺癌的女性(n = 312)被随机分配到4种小组条件中的一种:对照组、教育组、同伴讨论组或教育加同伴讨论组(联合组)。在4种条件下各开展7个小组(每个小组由8 - 12名女性组成),共28个小组。在干预前、干预后即刻以及干预后6个月测量适应情况。
在干预后即刻和干预后6个月,教育组对适应情况均呈现持续的积极影响。参与同伴讨论组没有益处,并且在两次随访检查中均有一些对适应情况产生不利影响的迹象。这些影响可以通过自尊、身体形象以及对疾病的侵入性想法的变化来解释。
基于教育的小组干预促进了被诊断为早期乳腺癌女性的初始适应。没有证据表明同伴讨论组干预有好处。