Salas E, Sekhar L N, Ziyal I M, Caputy A J, Wright D C
Department of Neurosurgery, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1999 Apr;90(2 Suppl):206-19. doi: 10.3171/spi.1999.90.2.0206.
The aim of this study was to describe six variations of the extreme-lateral craniocervical approach, their application, and treatment results.
During a 4-year period 69 patients underwent surgery in which six variations of the extreme-lateral craniocervical approach were performed. The variations included: the transfacetal approach (TFA), performed to treat four lesions in the upper cervical spine anterior or anterolateral to the spinal cord; the retrocondylar approach, to treat five intradural lesions located anterolateral to the medulla oblongata and six vascular lesions to expose the extradural segment of the vertebral artery (VA); the partial transcondylar approach (PTCA), to treat 18 intradural lesions located anterior to the medulla oblongata; the complete transcondylar approach (CTCA), to treat 13 extradural lesions that involved the lower clivus and anterior upper cervical spine; the extreme-lateral transjugular approach, to treat 14 jugular foramen tumors; and the transtubercular approach with or without division of the sigmoid sinus, to treat complex VA and vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms. An anatomical prosection was performed to study the surgical exposure of each of the six variations of the extreme-lateral craniocervical approach. Total removal was achieved in 35 (69%) of the patients with tumor; subtotal resection was achieved in 16 (31%) of those patients. In the 12 patients with VA aneurysms, seven underwent clipping, three underwent trapping and a vein graft bypass procedure, and two underwent trapping without the use of a bypass procedure. In five other patients, different cystic, inflammatory, and other vascular lesions were successfully treated. Fifty percent of the patients who underwent surgery via the TFA, 83% via the of the CTCA, and 11% via the PTCA required an occipitocervical fusion procedure. The mean Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 74.7 preoperatively and 76.4 postoperatively. Major complications were hydrocephalus (nine patients), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (seven patients), worsened cranial nerve function (seven patients), vertebrobasilar vasospasm (one patient), and sigmoid sinus thrombosis (one patient).
To treat lesions in the region of the foramen magnum and surrounding areas, the approach should be tailored to each specific lesion to provide the needed exposure without unnecessary operative steps.
本研究旨在描述极外侧颅颈入路的六种变异方式、其应用及治疗结果。
在4年期间,69例患者接受了手术,术中采用了极外侧颅颈入路的六种变异方式。这些变异方式包括:经关节突入路(TFA),用于治疗脊髓前方或前外侧上颈椎的四个病变;髁后入路,用于治疗延髓前外侧的五个硬膜内病变以及六个血管病变以暴露椎动脉(VA)的硬膜外段;部分经髁入路(PTCA),用于治疗延髓前方的18个硬膜内病变;完全经髁入路(CTCA),用于治疗累及下斜坡和上颈椎前方的13个硬膜外病变;极外侧经颈静脉入路,用于治疗14个颈静脉孔肿瘤;以及有或无乙状窦离断的经结节入路,用于治疗复杂的VA和椎基底动脉交界区动脉瘤。进行了解剖学解剖以研究极外侧颅颈入路六种变异方式各自的手术显露情况。35例(69%)肿瘤患者实现了全切;16例(31%)患者实现了次全切。在12例VA动脉瘤患者中,7例行夹闭术;3例行包裹术并进行静脉移植搭桥手术;2例行包裹术未使用搭桥手术。在其他5例患者中,不同的囊性、炎性及其他血管病变得到成功治疗。经TFA手术的患者中50%、经CTCA手术的患者中83%以及经PTCA手术的患者中11%需要进行枕颈融合手术。术前卡氏功能状态评分平均为74.7分,术后为76.4分。主要并发症包括脑积水(9例患者)、脑脊液漏(7例患者)、颅神经功能恶化(7例患者)、椎基底动脉痉挛(1例患者)以及乙状窦血栓形成(1例患者)。
为治疗枕骨大孔及周围区域的病变,应根据每个具体病变量身定制入路,以提供所需的显露而无需不必要的手术步骤。