Matsushima T, Matsukado K, Natori Y, Inamura T, Hitotsumatsu T, Fukui M
Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Neurosurg. 2001 Aug;95(2):268-74. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0268.
The authors report on the surgical results they achieved in caring for patients with vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery (VA-PICA) saccular aneurysms that were treated via either the transcondylar fossa (supracondylar transjugular tubercle) approach or the transcondylar approach. In this report they clarify the characteristics of and differences between these two lateral skull base approaches. They also present the techniques they used in performing the transcondylar fossa approach, especially the maneuver used to remove the jugular tubercle extradurally without injuring the atlantooccipital joint.
Eight patients underwent surgery for VA-PICA saccular aneurysms (six ruptured and two unruptured ones) during which one of the two approaches was performed. Clinical data including neurological and radiological findings and reports of the operative procedures were analyzed. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was used to estimate the activities of daily living experienced by the patients. In all cases the aneurysm was successfully clipped and no permanent neurological deficits remained, except for one case of severe vasospasm. In seven of the eight patients, the transcondylar fossa approach provided a sufficient operative field for clipping the aneurysm without difficulty. In the remaining patient, in whom the aneurysm was located at the midline on the clivus at the level of the hypoglossal canal, the aneurysm could not be found by using the transcondylar fossa approach; thus, the route was changed to the transcondylar approach, and clipping was performed below the hypoglossal nerve rootlets.
Both approaches offer excellent visualization and a wide working field, with ready access to the lesion. This remarkably reduces the risk of development of postoperative deficits. These approaches should be used properly; the transcondylar fossa approach is indicated for aneurysms located above the hypoglossal canal and the transcondylar approach is indicated for those located below it.
作者报告了他们在治疗椎动脉 - 小脑后下动脉(VA - PICA)囊状动脉瘤患者时所取得的手术结果,这些患者采用经髁窝(髁上经颈静脉结节)入路或经髁入路进行治疗。在本报告中,他们阐明了这两种侧颅底入路的特点及差异。他们还介绍了在经髁窝入路手术中所使用的技术,尤其是在硬膜外切除颈静脉结节而不损伤寰枕关节的操作方法。
8例患者因VA - PICA囊状动脉瘤接受手术(6例破裂,2例未破裂),术中采用了上述两种入路之一。分析了包括神经学和影像学检查结果以及手术过程报告在内的临床资料。采用格拉斯哥预后量表评估患者的日常生活活动能力。所有病例中,除1例发生严重血管痉挛外,动脉瘤均成功夹闭,未遗留永久性神经功能缺损。8例患者中有7例采用经髁窝入路,该入路为夹闭动脉瘤提供了足够的手术视野,操作顺利。在其余1例患者中,动脉瘤位于舌下神经管水平的斜坡中线处,经髁窝入路未能发现该动脉瘤;因此,手术路径改为经髁入路,并在舌下神经根下方进行夹闭。
两种入路均能提供良好的视野和广阔的操作空间,便于接近病变。这显著降低了术后出现功能缺损的风险。应正确使用这些入路;经髁窝入路适用于位于舌下神经管上方的动脉瘤,经髁入路适用于位于其下方的动脉瘤。