Grayson W, Taylor L F, Cooper K
Department of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand and the South African Institute for Medical Research, Johannesburg.
Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 Apr;23(4):448-58. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199904000-00010.
Adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) and adenoid basal carcinomas (ABCs) are rare neoplasms of the uterine cervix that are currently regarded as distinct clinicopathologic entities. Accurate distinction between ABCs and ACCs is of clinical importance because of differences in their biological behavior. This study compares the morphologic, mucin, and immunohistochemical profiles of 18 cervical ACCs, 8 ABCs, and 1 combined ABC-ACC. Serial sections from the 27 cases were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff-diastase, mucicarmine, and alcian blue and subjected to a panel of immunoperoxidase markers, namely, MNF116, CAM 5.2, CK7, CK20, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), S-100, HHF 35, laminin, and type IV collagen. One ACC was also examined ultrastructurally. Almost all patients were postmenopausal black women. The distinction between ABC and ACC was best made morphologically. Divergent epithelial differentiation was seen in 18 cases (11 ACCs, 6 ABCs, and 1 ABC-ACC). Six cases with intact surface epithelium showed a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. There was no significant difference in mucin staining. Both tumor types had a similar immunohistochemical profile, apart from type IV collagen and laminin staining, which occurred exclusively in relation to the extracellular basement membranelike material in the ACC. Eleven ACCs and three ABCs were S-100-positive, including the respective ACC and ABC components of the combined ABC-ACC. Eight of the S-100-positive neoplasms with ACC morphology also stained with HHF 35, suggesting myoepithelial differentiation. The latter was confirmed in one ACC examined ultrastructurally. The similar clinical profiles, apart from the different biological behavior, capacity for divergent differentiation, and the occurrence of ABC areas in some ACCs and vice versa suggest that these tumors may share a common histogenesis, forming part of a morphologic and biologic spectrum of basaloid cervical neoplasms of putative "reserve cell" origin. Circumstantial evidence suggests that ABC may be a precursor of cervical ACC.
腺样囊性癌(ACCs)和腺样基底细胞癌(ABCs)是子宫颈罕见的肿瘤,目前被视为不同的临床病理实体。由于ABCs和ACCs生物学行为存在差异,准确区分二者具有临床重要性。本研究比较了18例宫颈ACCs、8例ABCs和1例ABC-ACC合并病例的形态学、黏液及免疫组化特征。对这27例病例的连续切片进行苏木精和伊红染色、过碘酸-希夫-淀粉酶染色、黏卡红染色和阿尔辛蓝染色,并进行一组免疫过氧化物酶标记检测,即MNF116、CAM 5.2、CK7、CK20、上皮膜抗原、癌胚抗原(CEA)、S-100、HHF 35、层粘连蛋白和IV型胶原。对1例ACCs还进行了超微结构检查。几乎所有患者均为绝经后黑人女性。ABC和ACC的区分最好在形态学上进行。18例病例(11例ACCs、6例ABCs和1例ABC-ACC)可见不同程度的上皮分化。6例表面上皮完整的病例显示高级别鳞状上皮内病变。黏液染色无显著差异。除IV型胶原和层粘连蛋白染色外,两种肿瘤类型具有相似的免疫组化特征,IV型胶原和层粘连蛋白染色仅与ACCs中的细胞外基底膜样物质有关。11例ACCs和3例ABCs为S-100阳性,包括ABC-ACC合并病例中的各自ACCs和ABCs成分。8例具有ACCs形态的S-100阳性肿瘤也被HHF 35染色,提示肌上皮分化。这在1例接受超微结构检查的ACCs中得到证实。除了不同的生物学行为、分化能力以及一些ACCs中出现ABC区域,反之亦然外,相似的临床特征表明这些肿瘤可能具有共同的组织发生,构成了假定“储备细胞”起源的基底样宫颈肿瘤形态学和生物学谱的一部分。间接证据表明ABC可能是宫颈ACCs的前体。