Ugarte H, Silva E, Mercan D, De Mendonça A, Vincent J L
Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;27(3):498-504. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00024.
To determine the value of procalcitonin (ProCT) as a marker of infection in critically ill patients.
Prospective, observational study.
Medicosurgical department of intensive care (31 beds).
One hundred eleven infected and 79 noninfected patients.
None.
ProCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were monitored daily. The best cutoff values for ProCT and CRP were 0.6 ng/mL and 7.9 mg/dL, respectively. Compared with CRP, ProCT had a lower sensitivity (67.6 vs. 71.8), specificity (61.3 vs. 66.6), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.66 vs. 0.78, p < .05). The combination of ProCT and CRP increased the specificity for infection to 82.3%. In the infected patients, plasma ProCT, but not CRP, values were higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors. Infected patients with bacteremia had higher ProCT concentrations than those without bacteremia, but similar CRP concentrations. ProCT levels were particularly high in septic shock patients.
ProCT is not a better marker of infection than CRP in critically ill patients, but it can represent a useful adjunctive parameter to identify infection and is a useful marker of the severity of infection.
确定降钙素原(ProCT)作为重症患者感染标志物的价值。
前瞻性观察性研究。
内科重症监护病房(31张床位)。
111例感染患者和79例未感染患者。
无。
每日监测ProCT和C反应蛋白(CRP)浓度。ProCT和CRP的最佳临界值分别为0.6 ng/mL和7.9 mg/dL。与CRP相比,ProCT的敏感性较低(67.6对71.8)、特异性较低(61.3对66.6),以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积较小(0.66对0.78,p <.05)。ProCT和CRP联合使用可将感染的特异性提高到82.3%。在感染患者中,非幸存者的血浆ProCT值高于幸存者,而CRP值则不然。有菌血症的感染患者的ProCT浓度高于无菌血症的患者,但CRP浓度相似。脓毒性休克患者的ProCT水平特别高。
在重症患者中,ProCT作为感染标志物并不比CRP更好,但它可以作为识别感染的有用辅助参数,并且是感染严重程度的有用标志物。