Shokripour Mansoureh, Omidifar Navid, Salami Kourosh, Moghadami Mohsen, Samizadeh Babak
Department of Pathology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Biotechnology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020 Oct 31;2020:8362109. doi: 10.1155/2020/8362109. eCollection 2020.
To calculate the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels for the pathologic presence of microbes in the bloodstream of patients with malignancy, in comparison with blood culture. . Blood culture (by reference method) and assay results of PCT and CRP of febrile patients, with clinical suspicion to blood infections, were collected. Statistical aspects of PCT and CRP tests were evaluated.
Data from 255 cases were gathered. The area under the curve for differentiating bacteremia from nonbacteremia for PCT (0.741) was superior to that of CRP (0.612). Amongst the different cutoffs of PCT and CRP, the cutoff of ≥1.17 ng/ml and >47 mg/l had the sensitivity of 75 and 58.3%, the best NPV of 91.5% and 81.3%, and the best specificity of 79.9% and 72.8%, respectively. . Despite statistically nonsignificant results, PCT seems to be a superior indicator to CRP for rejecting the presence of microorganism in bloodstream. For PCT, the cutoff value of 1.17 ng/ml (bacteremia from nonbacteremia) had the highest NPV value of 91.5% in malignant patients, suspicion of sepsis.
与血培养相比,计算C反应蛋白(CRP)和血清降钙素原(PCT)水平对恶性肿瘤患者血流中微生物病理存在情况的诊断价值。收集了临床怀疑有血液感染的发热患者的血培养(采用参考方法)以及PCT和CRP的检测结果。对PCT和CRP检测的统计学方面进行了评估。
收集了255例患者的数据。PCT区分菌血症和非菌血症的曲线下面积(0.741)优于CRP(0.612)。在PCT和CRP的不同临界值中,≥1.17 ng/ml和>47 mg/l的临界值的敏感性分别为75%和58.3%,最佳阴性预测值分别为91.5%和81.3%,最佳特异性分别为79.9%和72.8%。尽管结果在统计学上无显著差异,但在排除血流中微生物存在方面,PCT似乎是比CRP更优的指标。对于PCT,在怀疑脓毒症的恶性患者中,1.17 ng/ml(区分菌血症和非菌血症)的临界值具有最高的阴性预测值,为91.5%。