Ryan MJ, Rand AS
Department of Zoology, University of Texas
Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):945-956. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1057.
We evaluated how various phylogenetic models for estimating ancestral characters can influence studies of behavioural evolution. Previously we used a single model of evolution to estimate the values of call characters at ancestral nodes for the Physalaemus pustulosus species group and some close relatives (Ryan & Rand 1995, Science, 269, 390-392). We then synthesized these ancestral calls and measured the females' responses to such calls in phonotaxis experiments. We repeated the above procedure to determine the sensitivity of these results and conclusions to various models used to estimate the ancestral call characters. We asked whether: (1) different models gave different call estimates for the same nodes; (2) different call estimates at the same node were perceived as different by females; and (3) differences in female responses influenced previous conclusions. We used seven different models that varied in at least one of the following parameters: tree topology (bifurcating versus pectinate in-group trees), algorithms (local squared-change versus squared-change parsimony), tempo (gradual or punctuated evolution), and outgroups (two or three outgroup taxa used). Although different models often gave different call estimates for the same node, these different estimates often were not perceived as different by the females. These data reinforce our previous conclusions that: (1) the range of female preferences exceeds the known variation of the conspecific call; (2) females do not discriminate between the conspecific call and the call of their most recent ancestor; and (3) female responses may be context dependent, given that females differ in their responses to the same signal variation in discrimination and recognition experiments. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
我们评估了用于估计祖先特征的各种系统发育模型如何影响行为进化研究。此前,我们使用单一的进化模型来估计脓疱姬蛙物种组及其一些近缘物种在祖先节点处的鸣声特征值(Ryan & Rand,1995年,《科学》,第269卷,第390 - 392页)。然后,我们合成了这些祖先鸣声,并在声诱实验中测量了雌性对这些鸣声的反应。我们重复上述过程,以确定这些结果和结论对用于估计祖先鸣声特征的各种模型的敏感性。我们提出了以下问题:(1)不同的模型对相同节点是否给出不同的鸣声估计;(2)雌性对同一节点的不同鸣声估计是否有不同的感知;(3)雌性反应的差异是否影响了先前的结论。我们使用了七种不同的模型,这些模型至少在以下一个参数上有所不同:树拓扑结构(内群树为二叉分支树与栉齿状树)、算法(局部平方变化与平方变化简约法)、进化速度(渐变或间断进化)以及外类群(使用两个或三个外类群分类单元)。尽管不同的模型通常对相同节点给出不同的鸣声估计,但雌性往往并未将这些不同的估计视为不同。这些数据强化了我们先前的结论:(1)雌性偏好的范围超过了已知的同种鸣声变异;(2)雌性无法区分同种鸣声与其最近祖先的鸣声;(3)鉴于雌性在辨别和识别实验中对相同信号变异的反应存在差异,雌性的反应可能取决于环境。版权所有1999年动物行为研究协会。