Lad R, Armstrong D
McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
Can J Gastroenterol. 1999 Mar;13(2):135-42. doi: 10.1155/1999/715703.
One major cause of peptic ulceration is the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The precise mechanisms through which NSAIDs cause peptic ulceration are unknown, but the discovery that they reduce the production of 'cytoprotective' prostaglandins led to the hypothesis that coadministration of exogenous prostaglandins heals and prevents NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers and other mucosal lesions. Studies using high doses of misoprostol have shown that it does have a protective effect; however, gastrointestinal intolerance of this prostaglandin E2 analogue is common. Early indications that acid suppression was effective in the management of NSAID-related peptic ulcers came from studies showing that gastric ulcers could be healed by omeprazole in patients who continued to take NSAIDs. Other studies suggested that acid suppression reduces the incidence of mucosal lesions but that standard dose ranitidine protects only against duodenal lesions. Subsequent studies reported that higher dose H2 receptor antagonist therapy can protect against both gastric and duodenal ulcers during continued NSAID therapy. An ideal therapeutic strategy would heal NSAID-related ulcers and prevent the development of new NSAID-related lesions and complications in patients who are unable to discontinue NSAID therapy. A number of recent studies indicate that effective acid-suppressive treatment with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole can achieve these aims. Overall, data from recent studies show that acid suppression with the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole at a dose of 20 mg daily is the most effective means of healing NSAID-associated gastroduodenal lesions and that it is the most effective prophylactic therapy. In the long run, the role of omeprazole will have to be evaluated with respect to its cost effectiveness compared with other strategies and with respect to the development of less damaging NSAIDs.
消化性溃疡的一个主要病因是使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。NSAIDs导致消化性溃疡的确切机制尚不清楚,但它们会减少“细胞保护”前列腺素的产生这一发现,引发了一种假说,即联合使用外源性前列腺素可治愈并预防NSAIDs引起的胃十二指肠溃疡及其他黏膜损伤。使用高剂量米索前列醇的研究表明,它确实具有保护作用;然而,这种前列腺素E2类似物的胃肠道不耐受情况很常见。早期表明抑酸对NSAIDs相关消化性溃疡治疗有效的迹象,来自于一些研究,这些研究显示,继续服用NSAIDs的患者中,奥美拉唑可治愈胃溃疡。其他研究表明,抑酸可降低黏膜损伤的发生率,但标准剂量的雷尼替丁仅对十二指肠损伤有保护作用。随后的研究报告称,在持续使用NSAIDs治疗期间,更高剂量的H2受体拮抗剂疗法可预防胃和十二指肠溃疡。一种理想的治疗策略应能治愈NSAIDs相关溃疡,并防止无法停用NSAIDs治疗的患者出现新的NSAIDs相关损伤和并发症。最近的一些研究表明,使用质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑进行有效的抑酸治疗可以实现这些目标。总体而言,近期研究数据表明,每日服用20毫克质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑进行抑酸,是治愈NSAIDs相关胃十二指肠损伤最有效的方法,也是最有效的预防性治疗方法。从长远来看,与其他策略相比,奥美拉唑的成本效益以及对危害较小的NSAIDs的研发,都需要对其作用进行评估。