Yamamoto I, Oshiro Y, Fukuda T, Tsuneyoshi M
Second Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Oncol Rep. 1999 May-Jun;6(3):533-7. doi: 10.3892/or.6.3.533.
Histologically it is often difficult to differentiate malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) from leiomyosarcoma. Sixty-three cases formerly diagnosed as pleomorphic soft tissue sarcomas were examined by immunohistochemistry. We identified three different types according to its positivity for the myogenic markers: A) positive cells with a fascicular pattern, 13 cases (26%); B) a small number of scattered positive cells, 29 cases (57%); C) negative for markers, 9 cases (17%). We reassessed 51 MFHs as follows: A type as pleomorphic leiomyosarcoma, B+C types as MFH. Pleomorphic leiomyosarcomas were also positive for collagen type IV around the compactly arranged individual tumor cells. An imunohistochemical analysis and detection of fascicular structures are thus considered to be necessary in order to distinguish between leiomyosarcoma and MFH.
从组织学上看,通常很难将恶性纤维组织细胞瘤(MFH)与平滑肌肉瘤区分开来。对63例先前诊断为多形性软组织肉瘤的病例进行了免疫组织化学检查。根据其对肌源性标志物的阳性反应,我们确定了三种不同类型:A)呈束状模式的阳性细胞,13例(26%);B)少量散在的阳性细胞,29例(57%);C)标志物阴性,9例(17%)。我们对51例MFH进行了如下重新评估:A类型为多形性平滑肌肉瘤,B + C类型为MFH。多形性平滑肌肉瘤在紧密排列的单个肿瘤细胞周围的IV型胶原也呈阳性。因此,为了区分平滑肌肉瘤和MFH,免疫组织化学分析和束状结构的检测被认为是必要的。