• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓释文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和三环类抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Comparison of extended-release venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Einarson T R, Arikian S R, Casciano J, Doyle J J

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital for Sick Children, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1999 Feb;21(2):296-308. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88287-9.

DOI:10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88287-9
PMID:10211533
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to summarize and compare the clinical success rates of extended-release venlafaxine, some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and certain tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). A meta-analytic approach was used to synthesize outcomes from published randomized controlled trials involving patients scoring > or =15 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) or > or =18 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases were performed, as were searches of references from retrieved articles and reviews. Drugs included in the comparison were extended-release venlafaxine (venlafaxine-XR); the SSRIs citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline; and the TCAs amitriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, and nortriptyline. Therapeutic success was defined as a 50% decrease in the HAM-D or MADRS score. Data were extracted by 2 independent evaluators, with differences resolved through consensus discussions. Weighted mean success rates were calculated for each drug class, using a random-effects model. The resulting data represent 44 trials with 63 study arms and 4033 patients with depression. Venlafaxine-XR demonstrated a 73.7% success rate, which was statistically significantly greater than that of the studied SSRIs (61.1%) and TCAs (57.9%) (P<0.001). Thus this meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies of patients with depression suggests that venlafaxine-XR is clinically superior in efficacy to SSRIs and TCAs. Venlafaxine-XR also had universally lower, though nonsignificant, dropout rates.

摘要

本研究旨在总结并比较缓释文拉法辛、某些选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)及某些三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)的临床成功率。采用荟萃分析方法,综合已发表的随机对照试验结果,这些试验的受试患者在汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)上得分≥15或在蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)上得分≥18。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和国际药学文摘数据库,同时也检索了检索到的文章及综述中的参考文献。纳入比较的药物有缓释文拉法辛(venlafaxine-XR);SSRI类药物西酞普兰、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀和舍曲林;以及TCA类药物阿米替林、丙咪嗪、地昔帕明和去甲替林。治疗成功定义为HAM-D或MADRS评分降低50%。由两名独立评估人员提取数据,通过共识讨论解决分歧。使用随机效应模型计算每个药物类别的加权平均成功率。所得数据代表44项试验,共63个研究组,4033例抑郁症患者。缓释文拉法辛的成功率为73.7%,在统计学上显著高于所研究的SSRI(61.1%)和TCA(57.9%)(P<0.001)。因此,这项对抑郁症患者随机对照研究的荟萃分析表明,缓释文拉法辛在疗效上临床优于SSRI和TCA。缓释文拉法辛的停药率普遍较低,尽管无统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Comparison of extended-release venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.缓释文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和三环类抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 1999 Feb;21(2):296-308. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88287-9.
2
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.与传统选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及文拉法辛缓释剂相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006 Mar;31(2):122-31.
3
A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.急性重度抑郁症(MDD)的多国药物经济学评估:文拉法辛、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)的成本效益比较
Value Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;4(1):16-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x.
4
Venlafaxine extended-release: a review of its use in the management of major depression.文拉法辛缓释剂:用于治疗重度抑郁症的综述
CNS Drugs. 2001;15(8):643-69. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115080-00007.
5
The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药及安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):172-85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
6
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的药物经济学分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 2):286-96. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00019.
7
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
8
Comparative efficacy between venlafaxine and SSRIs: a pooled analysis of patients with depression.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的疗效比较:抑郁症患者的汇总分析
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Dec 15;52(12):1166-74. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01425-7.
9
Duloxetine and venlafaxine-XR in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.度洛西汀与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗重度抑郁症:随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Nov;39(11):1798-807. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G076. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
10
Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.对于对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,文拉法辛缓释剂与西酞普兰的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):113-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f424c2.

引用本文的文献

1
Discontinuation of antidepressant treatment: a retrospective cohort study on more than 20,000 participants.抗抑郁药治疗的停药:一项针对20000多名参与者的回顾性队列研究。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 24;22(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00480-z.
2
Association of Antidepressant Medication Type With the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in the ARIC Study.抗抑郁药类型与 ARIC 研究中心血管疾病发生率的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 4;8(11):e012503. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012503. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2018 Jan 15;48(1):64-153.
4
The prospective, 24-week assessment of cost-efficacy of and compliance to antidepressant medications in a rural setting (PACECAR) study.农村地区抗抑郁药物成本效益与依从性的前瞻性24周评估(PACECAR)研究
Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr-Jun;59(2):157-163. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_202_17.
5
Evaluation of anxiolytic effects of aripiprazole and hydroxyzine as a combination in mice.阿立哌唑与羟嗪联合用药对小鼠抗焦虑作用的评估。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016 Sep;7(4):97-104. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.189429.
6
Meta-analysis of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) Compared to Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs) in the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-depression Therapy in Parkinson's Disease(PD) Patients.帕金森病(PD)患者抗抑郁治疗中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)与三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)疗效及安全性比较的Meta分析
Iran J Pharm Res. 2014 Fall;13(4):1213-9.
7
Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂疗效及耐受性的重新评估:荟萃分析
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Mar;196(4):511-20; discussion 521-2. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0975-9. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
8
Cost effectiveness of representatives of three classes of antidepressants used in major depression in the UK.英国用于治疗重度抑郁症的三类抗抑郁药的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(5):311-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422050-00005.
9
Effects of acute treatment with paroxetine, citalopram and venlafaxine in vivo on noradrenaline and serotonin outflow: a microdialysis study in Swiss mice.帕罗西汀、西酞普兰和文拉法辛急性治疗对瑞士小鼠体内去甲肾上腺素和5-羟色胺流出的影响:一项微透析研究
Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;140(6):1128-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705538. Epub 2003 Oct 6.
10
Venlafaxine extended-release: a review of its use in the management of major depression.文拉法辛缓释剂:用于治疗重度抑郁症的综述
CNS Drugs. 2001;15(8):643-69. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115080-00007.