Kietlińska Z, Stelmachów J, Antczak-Judycka A, Timorek A, Sawicki W, Tymińska B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, II Faculty of Medicine, The Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19(6):561-4.
The value of preoperative diagnostic procedures (FC, hysteroscopy, TVS, MRI, CT) used to evaluate cervical canal involvement in cases of endometrial carcinoma was assessed. The results of these diagnostic methods were compared to postoperative pathologic examination results. Evaluation of the cervix by CT was limited. High NPV of the rest of the methods together with their negative results allowed us to exclude cervical infiltration with a high probability. Alas, none of them was adequate to confirm the presence of cervical involvement because of their low PPV which ranged from 8.3% (hysteroscopy) to 50% (MRI). Among all these diagnostic procedures TVS was relatively efficient (77.8%), specific (78%), sensitive (75%) and inexpensive. This method is preferable in the evaluation of possible cervical infiltration.
评估了用于评估子宫内膜癌病例宫颈管受累情况的术前诊断程序(宫腔镜检查、宫腔镜、经阴道超声、磁共振成像、计算机断层扫描)的价值。将这些诊断方法的结果与术后病理检查结果进行了比较。计算机断层扫描对宫颈的评估有限。其他方法的高阴性预测值及其阴性结果使我们能够大概率排除宫颈浸润。遗憾的是,由于其阳性预测值较低,范围从8.3%(宫腔镜检查)到50%(磁共振成像),没有一种方法足以确诊宫颈受累。在所有这些诊断程序中,经阴道超声相对高效(77.8%)、特异(78%)、敏感(75%)且成本低廉。该方法在评估可能的宫颈浸润方面更可取。