Lucas G F, Rogers S E
International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, Bristol, UK.
Transfus Med. 1999 Mar;9(1):63-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1999.009001063.x.
Twenty-six serum samples from 24 patients were investigated for the presence of platelet-specific antibodies in a partly retrospective (n = 15) and partly prospective (n = 9) study. The sera contained either alloantibodies to human platelet antigens (HPA) (n = 23) or were from clinically suspected cases of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAITP) in which platelet-specific antibodies had not been detected (n = 3). Three techniques were used to detect platelet antibodies: the platelet immunofluorescence test, the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay and a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay--GTI PakPlus (GTI kit). Two alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antiglobulin reagents provided by the manufacturer were used in the GTI kit: an antihuman IgG/IgA/IgM (IgGAM) conjugate and an antihuman IgG conjugate. The GTI kit with the anti-IgGAM conjugate failed to detect eight antibody specificities in seven sera (anti-HPA-1a [n = 3], anti-HPA-3a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3b [n = 1] and anti-HPA-5b [n = 3]). Greater signal-to-background ratios were achieved in the GTI kit with the anti-IgG conjugate but five antibody specificities (anti-HPA-1a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3b [n = 1], anti-HPA-5b [n = 2]) remained undetectable. All the sera were detected by MAIPA assay and, furthermore, the MAIPA assay achieved the greatest signal-to-background ratio in the majority of sera tested. These findings re-emphasize the value of the MAIPA assay in reference laboratories and illustrate that the GTI kit may either fail to detect or incorrectly identify clinically significant HPA antibodies.
在一项部分回顾性(n = 15)和部分前瞻性(n = 9)的研究中,对来自24例患者的26份血清样本进行了血小板特异性抗体检测。这些血清中要么含有针对人类血小板抗原(HPA)的同种抗体(n = 23),要么来自临床疑似胎儿母体同种免疫性血小板减少症(FMAITP)病例,而其中未检测到血小板特异性抗体(n = 3)。使用了三种技术来检测血小板抗体:血小板免疫荧光试验、血小板抗原单克隆抗体固定(MAIPA)测定法以及一种市售的酶联免疫吸附测定法——GTI PakPlus(GTI试剂盒)。GTI试剂盒使用了制造商提供的两种碱性磷酸酶偶联抗球蛋白试剂:抗人IgG/IgA/IgM(IgGAM)偶联物和抗人IgG偶联物。含有抗IgGAM偶联物的GTI试剂盒未能检测出7份血清中的8种抗体特异性(抗HPA - 1a [n = 3]、抗HPA - 3a [n = 1]、抗HPA - 3b [n = 1]和抗HPA - 5b [n = 3])。含有抗IgG偶联物的GTI试剂盒实现了更高的信号背景比,但仍有5种抗体特异性(抗HPA - 1a [n = 1]、抗HPA - 3a [n = 1]、抗HPA - 3b [n = 1]、抗HPA - 5b [n = 2])未被检测到。所有血清均通过MAIPA测定法检测出来,此外,在大多数检测的血清中,MAIPA测定法实现了最高的信号背景比。这些发现再次强调了MAIPA测定法在参考实验室中的价值,并表明GTI试剂盒可能无法检测到或错误识别具有临床意义的HPA抗体。