• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌筛查:时间、行程与自付费用。

Screening for breast cancer: time, travel, and out-of-pocket expenses.

作者信息

Secker-Walker R H, Vacek P M, Hooper G J, Plante D A, Detsky A S

机构信息

Office of Health Promotion Research, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Apr 21;91(8):702-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.8.702.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/91.8.702
PMID:10218508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We estimated the personal costs to women found to have a breast problem (either breast cancer or benign breast disease) in terms of time spent, miles traveled, and cash payments made for detection, diagnosis, initial treatment, and follow-up.

METHODS

We analyzed data from personal interviews with 465 women from four communities in Florida. These women were randomly selected from those with a recent breast biopsy (within 6-8 months) that indicated either breast cancer (208 women) or benign breast disease (257 women). One community was the site of a multifaceted intervention to promote breast screening, and the other three communities were comparison sites for evaluation of that intervention. All P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

In comparison with time spent and travel distance for women with benign breast disease (13 hours away from home and 56 miles traveled), time spent and travel distance were statistically significantly higher (P<.001) for treatment and follow-up of women with breast cancer (89 hours and 369 miles). Personal financial costs for treatment of women with breast cancer were also statistically significantly higher (breast cancer = $604; benign breast disease = $76; P < .001) but were statistically significantly lower for detection and diagnosis (breast cancer = $170; benign breast disease = $310; P < .001). Among women with breast cancer, time spent for treatment was statistically significantly lower (P = .013) when their breast cancer was detected by screening (68.9 hours) than when it was detected because of symptoms (84.2 hours). Personal cash payments for detection, diagnosis, and treatment were statistically significantly lower among women whose breast problems were detected by screening than among women whose breast problems were detected because of symptoms (screening detected = $453; symptom detected = $749; P = .045).

CONCLUSION

There are substantial personal costs for women who are found to have a breast problem, whether the costs are associated with problems identified through screening or because of symptoms.

摘要

背景

我们估算了被查出患有乳房问题(乳腺癌或良性乳腺疾病)的女性在时间、行程以及用于检查、诊断、初始治疗和后续跟进的现金支付方面的个人成本。

方法

我们分析了对佛罗里达州四个社区的465名女性进行个人访谈的数据。这些女性是从近期(6 - 8个月内)进行乳房活检且结果显示为乳腺癌(208名女性)或良性乳腺疾病(257名女性)的人群中随机选取的。其中一个社区是开展多方面干预措施以促进乳房筛查的地点,另外三个社区作为该干预措施评估的对照地点。所有P值均为双侧。

结果

与患有良性乳腺疾病的女性所花费的时间和行程(离家13小时,行程56英里)相比,乳腺癌女性在治疗和后续跟进方面所花费的时间和行程在统计学上显著更高(P <.001)(89小时和369英里)。乳腺癌女性的个人治疗费用在统计学上也显著更高(乳腺癌 = 604美元;良性乳腺疾病 = 76美元;P <.001),但在检查和诊断方面在统计学上显著更低(乳腺癌 = 170美元;良性乳腺疾病 = 310美元;P <.001)。在乳腺癌女性中,通过筛查发现乳腺癌时的治疗时间在统计学上显著更低(P =.013)(68.9小时),而因出现症状发现乳腺癌时的治疗时间为(84.2小时)。通过筛查发现乳房问题的女性在检查、诊断和治疗方面的个人现金支付在统计学上显著低于因出现症状发现乳房问题的女性(筛查发现 = 453美元;症状发现 = 749美元;P =.045)。

结论

被查出患有乳房问题的女性会产生巨大的个人成本,无论这些成本是与通过筛查发现的问题还是因出现症状而发现的问题相关。

相似文献

1
Screening for breast cancer: time, travel, and out-of-pocket expenses.乳腺癌筛查:时间、行程与自付费用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Apr 21;91(8):702-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.8.702.
2
Personal costs incurred by women attending a mammographic screening programme.参加乳房X光筛查项目的女性所产生的个人费用。
Med J Aust. 1991 Jan 21;154(2):132-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb121001.x.
3
Out-of-pocket costs in the year after early breast cancer among Canadian women and spouses.加拿大女性及其配偶在早期乳腺癌后一年的自付费用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Feb 20;105(4):280-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs512. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
4
Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.乳腺钼靶筛查的回顾性成本效益分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 7;98(11):774-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj210.
5
At What Cost to Clinical Trial Enrollment? A Retrospective Study of Patient Travel Burden in Cancer Clinical Trials.患者参加癌症临床试验的交通负担:一项回顾性研究
Oncologist. 2018 Oct;23(10):1242-1249. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0628. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.家族性乳腺癌风险女性的磁共振成像筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 4;105(17):1314-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt203. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
The patient burden of screening mammography recall.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影召回的患者负担。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep;23 Suppl 1:S11-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.1511.
8
Out-of-pocket costs for accessing adjuvant radiotherapy among Canadian women with breast cancer.加拿大乳腺癌女性接受辅助放疗的自付费用。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 20;29(30):4007-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.1007. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
9
Cost-effectiveness of the Norwegian breast cancer screening program.挪威乳腺癌筛查项目的成本效益
Int J Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;140(4):833-840. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30513. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Transportation barriers, emergency department use, and mortality risk among us adults: a national health interview survey analysis.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Oct 6;25(1):3348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24670-4.
2
Downstream healthcare use following breast cancer screening: a register-based cohort study.乳腺癌筛查后的下游医疗保健利用情况:一项基于登记册的队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2025 Mar 10;79(4):242-248. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-222818.
3
Influencing Factors of Transportation Costs Regarding Healthcare Service Utilization in Korea.韩国医疗服务利用的交通成本影响因素。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Sep 7;35(35):e290. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e290.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profile Testing in Community Practice.基因表达谱检测在社区实践中的成本效益。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;36(6):554-562. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.5034. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Contact frequency, travel time, and travel costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿性关节炎患者的就诊频率、就诊时间和就诊费用。
Int J Rheumatol. 2014;2014:285951. doi: 10.1155/2014/285951. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
6
Empirical evidence of the continuing improvement in cost efficiency of an endoscopic surveillance programme for gastric cancer in Singapore from 2004 to 2010.2004 年至 2010 年新加坡胃癌内镜监测项目成本效率持续提高的经验证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 15;13:139. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-139.
7
Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变携带者中交替磁共振成像和数字乳房 X 线摄影筛查的成本效益。
Cancer. 2013 Mar 15;119(6):1266-76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27864. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
8
Is distance to provider a barrier to care for medicaid patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer?距离医疗机构的远近是否会成为医疗补助计划中患有乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌的患者获得治疗的障碍?
J Rural Health. 2012 Jan;28(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00371.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
9
Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of the COMBINE study for alcohol dependent patients: the patient perspective.重新审视 COMBINE 研究在酒精依赖患者中的成本效益:患者视角。
Med Care. 2010 Apr;48(4):306-13. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181ca3d40.
10
Patient time requirements for anticoagulation therapy with warfarin.华法林抗凝治疗的患者时间要求。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Mar-Apr;30(2):206-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09343960. Epub 2009 Sep 22.