Suppr超能文献

对于穿透性胸部损伤,30分钟是进行急诊室开胸手术(ERT)的黄金时间吗?

Is 30 minutes the golden period to perform emergency room thoratomy (ERT) in penetrating chest injuries?

作者信息

Frezza E E, Mezghebe H

机构信息

Howard University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999 Feb;40(1):147-51.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency room thoracotomy (ERT), a controversial procedure, was introduced to improve resuscitation of trauma patients. No study has been conducted to evaluate the importance of the time in the field (down time) in the initial survival of penetrating chest trauma requiring ERT. In addition to this, many factors have been considered to predict the success of ERT, but they are multiple and are not easy to assess in the brief period of decision making to perform an ERT. We decided, therefore, to see if the pre hospital time could be used as the principal parameter to predict whether TERT in emergency Department (ED) with the arrival of penetrating chest trauma is useful.

METHODS

Records of the Howard University Hospital Emergency Department (ED) were reviewed for all trauma patients between June 1992 and January 1995. The pre-admission data were obtained from Emergency Medical Service (EMS) reports, including the "down time". All patients who underwent ERT had vital signs documented by EMS in the field. Forensic autopsies were performed within 48 hours after death following practice standards already described.

RESULTS

Between January 1987 and June 1994, 58 adult patients presented with penetrating chest trauma at the Howard University Hospital Emergency Department. Pre-admission data were available for 49 of 58 chest trauma patients. Sixteen patients (33%), with no documented vital signs in the field, were pronounced dead on arrival in the ED, and no ERT was performed on them. The remaining thirty-three patients (57%) underwent ERT. In all patients with chest injury, the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) was below 4 on arrival to the ED. Considering only the patients (n=33) that underwent ERT 82% (n=27) of patients had vital sings upon arrival in ED, 19% (n=6) had no vital signs until arrival to the ED. Patients with multiple wound GS or SW (more than four) died on arrival (18%; n=6). The patients with single gun shot wounds or stab wounds (GSW/SW) survived initially and underwent ERT (82%; n=27). Of the patients who underwent ERT, (n=6; 18%) had GSW and (12%), (n=4) had SW. Among those patients that died in ED, 12% (n=4) had a drop of SBP of more than 50 mmHg and only 24% (n=8) presented with a SBP less than 70 mmHg. Average scene time was 11.2+/-8.1 min, the transit time was 7.9+/-5.6 min and the average ED resuscitation time was 10+/-3.2 min. Of the patients that arrived in ED within 30 minutes 63% (n=20) survived the first 24 hours, and of these only 9% (n=3) had no vital signs upon arrival. The remaining 28% (n=6), who arrived in ED after half hour, either died during the transportation or upon arrival to the ED; none of them had vital signs upon arrival. All the patients transferred to the ICU died within 24 to 78 hr, secondary to severe arrhythmia or cerebral hypoxia. Autopsy was performed in all the patients. Among the patients that died upon arrival in the ED, the most common injury responsible for death was ventricular injury with exanguination in the first 24 hours. Of the 9% of patients that died in the ED after ERT, the injury was caused by a 9 mm caliber gun, which created a major laceration to the ventricle which was not possible to repair during the ERT. In the patients that died after stab wound (12%; n=4), the patients were stabbed at least 3 times in the chest and they died of arrhythmia. Among the survivors of ERT that were transported in ICU, uncontrollable arrhythmia and acute lung injury was the cause of death within 24-72 hours in 45% (n=15) of patients while cerebral hypoxia complicated irreparably the life expectancy with death at 72 hours in 60% (n=20) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The only role of ERT in our opinion is in patients who arrive within 30 minutes of pre hospital time, with a witnessed vital signed in the field. Multiple wounds, low SBP and higher caliber bullet injuries are also negative prognostic factors.

摘要

背景

急诊室开胸手术(ERT)是一种存在争议的手术,其目的是改善创伤患者的复苏情况。尚未有研究评估现场时间(停机时间)对需要ERT的穿透性胸部创伤患者初始生存的重要性。除此之外,许多因素被认为可预测ERT的成功,但这些因素众多,且在决定是否进行ERT的短暂时间内不易评估。因此,我们决定探讨院前时间是否可作为预测急诊科(ED)对穿透性胸部创伤患者进行ERT是否有用的主要参数。

方法

回顾了1992年6月至1995年1月期间霍华德大学医院急诊科(ED)所有创伤患者的记录。入院前数据来自紧急医疗服务(EMS)报告,包括“停机时间”。所有接受ERT的患者在现场均有EMS记录的生命体征。按照已描述的实践标准,在死亡后48小时内进行法医尸检。

结果

1987年1月至1994年6月期间,58例成年患者在霍华德大学医院急诊科表现为穿透性胸部创伤。58例胸部创伤患者中有49例可获得入院前数据。16例患者(33%)在现场无生命体征记录,到达ED时被宣布死亡,未对其进行ERT。其余33例患者(57%)接受了ERT。所有胸部受伤患者到达ED时的修正创伤评分(RTS)均低于4分。仅考虑接受ERT的患者(n = 33),82%(n = 27)的患者到达ED时有生命体征,19%(n = 6)的患者在到达ED前无生命体征。多处伤口GS或SW(超过四处)的患者到达时死亡(18%;n = 6)。单发枪伤或刺伤(GSW/SW)的患者最初存活并接受了ERT(82%;n = 27)。接受ERT的患者中,(n = 6;18%)为GSW,(12%),(n = 4)为SW。在ED死亡的患者中,12%(n = 4)的患者收缩压下降超过50 mmHg,仅24%(n = 8)的患者收缩压低于70 mmHg。平均现场时间为11.2±8.1分钟,转运时间为7.9±5.6分钟,平均ED复苏时间为10±3.2分钟。在30分钟内到达ED的患者中,63%(n = 20)存活了最初的24小时,其中只有9%(n = 3)到达时无生命体征。其余28%(n = 6)在半小时后到达ED的患者,要么在转运过程中死亡,要么到达ED时死亡;他们到达时均无生命体征。所有转入ICU的患者在24至78小时内死亡,继发于严重心律失常或脑缺氧。对所有患者均进行了尸检。在到达ED时死亡的患者中,导致死亡的最常见损伤是心室损伤并在最初24小时内失血。在ERT后在ED死亡的9%患者中,损伤是由9毫米口径枪支造成的,该枪造成心室严重撕裂,在ERT期间无法修复。在刺伤后死亡的患者(12%;n = 4)中,患者胸部至少被刺3次,死于心律失常。在ERT幸存者中被转运至ICU的患者中,45%(n = 15)的患者在24 - 72小时内因无法控制的心律失常和急性肺损伤死亡,而60%(n = 20)的患者因脑缺氧在72小时内不可挽回地使预期寿命复杂化并导致死亡。

结论

我们认为ERT的唯一作用是针对院前时间在30分钟内到达、在现场有生命体征记录的患者。多处伤口、低收缩压和高口径子弹伤也是不良预后因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验