del Rosario Rodríguez Moreno M, Rodríguez Moreno I, León M T, Boy M, Cowdry Agnieszka N
Service of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Granada, Spain.
Nephron. 1999;82(1):65-71. doi: 10.1159/000045369.
Urine diagnosis by light microscopy is considerably more difficult when specimens are analyzed after a certain period of time.
(1) To investigate whether this change effectively exists at a significant level of 12 h. (2) To apply measures, once the above has been done, allowing for the analysis of samples beyond 12 h in similar conditions.
Both freshly produced urine and pathological samples were used under certain experimental conditions: initial, 12 h, 12 h + fridge at 4 degrees C (F), 12 h + chemical preservation (S) and 12 h + SF. The chemical preservative was prepared at a 50/50 ratio with 3% formaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde by the addition of a buffer of pH 7.2-7.4, resulting in a solution of pH 7.35 at 25 degrees C room temperature. Urinalysis was carried out on all samples: glucose (enzymatic method of hexokinase) and total protein in liquid (red pyrogallol method). Centrifugation was followed by sediment analysis with light microscopy. Statistical analysis was done with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, Friedman nonparametric test and multiple comparisons.
Urine samples tested 12 h after having been produced changed significantly (p<0.0001), making it necessary to adopt certain measures to maintain their initial conditions. In our case, after the addition of the chemical preservative, samples did not present any changes (p>0.10) in relation to the initial conditions and were seen to be reliable, therefore indicating the suitability and effectiveness of the analytical conditions (urinalysis in particular, sediment analysis).
