Suppr超能文献

两节加一节心理治疗:认知行为疗法与心理动力人际疗法治疗亚综合征性抑郁的随机对照试验结果

Psychotherapy in two-plus-one sessions: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy for subsyndromal depression.

作者信息

Barkham M, Shapiro D A, Hardy G E, Rees A

机构信息

Psychological Therapies Research Centre, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Apr;67(2):201-11. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.2.201.

Abstract

A total of 116 clients with a range of subsyndromal depression received 3 therapy sessions: 2 sessions 1 week apart followed by a 3rd session 3 months later (the 2 + 1 model). Clients were stratified for severity on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) as stressed, subclinical, or low-level clinically depressed. In a 2 x 2 design, they received either cognitive-behavioral (CB) or psychodynamic-interpersonal (PI) therapy, either immediately or after a 4-week delay. An initial advantage for the immediate condition disappeared once the delayed-condition clients received treatment. Improvement rates at the end of treatment were 67% (stressed), 72% (subclinical), and 65% (low-level clinically depressed). There were no significant differences between CB and PI treatment methods, with the exception at 1-year follow-up, when the BDI showed a significant advantage for CB. Implications for designing very brief planned interventions are discussed.

摘要

共有116名患有不同程度亚综合征抑郁症的患者接受了3次治疗:两次治疗间隔1周,3个月后进行第三次治疗(2 + 1模式)。根据贝克抑郁量表(BDI)的严重程度,将患者分为压力型、亚临床型或轻度临床抑郁型。在2×2设计中,他们要么立即接受认知行为(CB)治疗或心理动力人际(PI)治疗,要么在延迟4周后接受治疗。一旦延迟治疗组的患者接受治疗,立即治疗组的初始优势就消失了。治疗结束时的改善率分别为67%(压力型)、72%(亚临床型)和65%(轻度临床抑郁型)。CB和PI治疗方法之间没有显著差异,但在1年随访时除外,此时BDI显示CB有显著优势。文中讨论了设计非常简短的计划性干预措施的意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验