Grebenschikov N, Sweep F, Geurts A, Andreasen P, De Witte H, Schousboe S, Heuvel J, Benraad T
Department of Chemical Endocrinology, University Hospital Nijmegen St. Radboud, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 1999 May 17;81(4):598-606. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990517)81:4<598::aid-ijc16>3.0.co;2-9.
An ELISA has been developed for the assessment of complexes between the urokinase-type (uPA) and the tissue-type plasminogen (tPA) activators with their inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) in cell-culture medium and cytosolic extracts of breast tumours. The "4-stage/2-site" ELISA involves 2 polyclonal antibodies in the pre-analyte stage 2 and in the post-analyte stage. For the specific measurement of the uPA-PAI-1 complex, 2 assay formats may be employed, uPA/PAI-1 and PAI-1/uPA. This offers an attractive facility for quality-assessment studies of this kind of assays. Analogously, the tPA-PAI-1 complex was assessed using the formats tPA/PAI-1 and PAI-1/tPA. Only complexes are able to evoke a signal in their appropriate assay formats. The free component, however, which responds to the capture antibody, could interfere with the binding of the complex molecule, reducing the OD signal. Increasing the coating Ab concentration diminishes the signal-suppressing effect of the free component. In 15 cell-culture supernatants, uPA and PAI-1 concentrations were measured as well as the uPA of PAI-1 complex in different dilutions in 2 assay formats. The differences between the values of complex measured in the 2 assay formats could be accounted for by the free uPA and PAI-1 concentrations. At dilution 1:10, the measured values obtained in the 2 separate formats differed substantially (correlation coefficient r = 0.641). At dilution 1:20, the differences were already smaller between the values (agreement 0.945). At dilution 1:30, close agreement between the corresponding values was observed (r = 0.971). Extrapolation to infinite dilution of the results obtained resulted in an even closer estimation of the complex concentration. Comparable results have been observed when tPA, PAI-1 and tPA-PAI-1 values were measured in tumour biopsy extracts.
已开发出一种酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),用于评估尿激酶型(uPA)和组织型纤溶酶原(tPA)激活剂与其1型抑制剂(PAI-1)在乳腺肿瘤细胞培养基和细胞溶质提取物中的复合物。“4阶段/2位点”ELISA在分析前阶段2和分析后阶段涉及2种多克隆抗体。为了特异性测量uPA-PAI-1复合物,可采用2种测定形式,即uPA/PAI-1和PAI-1/uPA。这为这类测定的质量评估研究提供了一个有吸引力的便利条件。类似地,使用tPA/PAI-1和PAI-1/tPA形式评估tPA-PAI-1复合物。只有复合物能够在其适当的测定形式中引发信号。然而,对捕获抗体有反应的游离成分可能会干扰复合分子的结合,降低光密度(OD)信号。增加包被抗体浓度可减少游离成分的信号抑制作用。在15种细胞培养上清液中,测量了uPA和PAI-1的浓度以及2种测定形式中不同稀释度下uPA与PAI-1复合物的浓度。2种测定形式中测得的复合物值之间的差异可由游离uPA和PAI-1的浓度来解释。在1:10稀释时,2种单独形式中获得的测量值有很大差异(相关系数r = 0.641)。在1:20稀释时,这些值之间的差异已经较小(一致性为0.945)。在1:30稀释时,观察到相应值之间有密切一致性(r = 0.971)。对所得结果进行无限稀释外推,可更精确地估计复合物浓度。在肿瘤活检提取物中测量tPA、PAI-1和tPA-PAI-1值时,也观察到了类似结果。