• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全景X线摄影中手动与自动曝光控制的临床及体外胶片质量比较

Clinical and in vitro film quality comparison of manual and automatic exposure control in panoramic radiography.

作者信息

Eraso F E, Ludlow J B, Platin E, Tyndall D, Phillips C

机构信息

Nova Southeastern University, College of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Fla 33328, USA.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Apr;87(4):518-23. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70255-6.

DOI:10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70255-6
PMID:10225638
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Automatic exposure control has been used successfully in medicine to improve image quality and reduce the number of retakes necessitated by inadequate operator selection of exposure factors. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of automatic exposure control on panoramic image quality.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 352 patients were imaged with either the OP 100 or the Orthophos Plus panoramic machine. An expert consensus panel judged film quality using a 5-point scale. Differences in quality that would have resulted from the use of operator-determined exposures were calculated through use of an algorithm validated with test images of a human phantom.

RESULTS

McNemar's test demonstrated significant improvements in quality with automatic exposure control (P = .001) in comparison with manual exposure control. No quality difference was found between the 2 machines (P = .9661). Manual exposure selection by oral and maxillofacial radiology residents was better than selection by technologists and assistants (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the utility of automatic exposure control for panoramic radiography.

摘要

目的

自动曝光控制已在医学领域成功应用,以提高图像质量并减少因操作员对曝光因素选择不当而导致的重拍次数。本研究的目的是评估自动曝光控制对全景图像质量的影响。

研究设计

共有352名患者使用OP 100或Orthophos Plus全景机进行成像。一个专家共识小组使用5分制对胶片质量进行评判。通过使用经人体模型测试图像验证的算法,计算出使用操作员确定的曝光量所导致的质量差异。

结果

与手动曝光控制相比,McNemar检验显示自动曝光控制在质量上有显著改善(P = 0.001)。两台机器之间未发现质量差异(P = 0.9661)。口腔颌面放射科住院医师手动选择曝光优于技术人员和助手(P = 0.006)。

结论

本研究证实了自动曝光控制在全景放射摄影中的实用性。

相似文献

1
Clinical and in vitro film quality comparison of manual and automatic exposure control in panoramic radiography.全景X线摄影中手动与自动曝光控制的临床及体外胶片质量比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Apr;87(4):518-23. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70255-6.
2
Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.使用自适应滤波在全景X线摄影中优化曝光并保持图像质量。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(3):229-35. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1100752. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Updated quality assurance self-assessment exercise in intraoral and panoramic radiography. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Radiology Practice Committee.口腔内及全景X线摄影的质量保证自我评估更新练习。美国口腔颌面放射学会,放射学实践委员会。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Mar;89(3):369-74. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(00)70104-1.
4
An update on dental imaging.牙科影像学的最新进展。
Br Dent J. 1998 Aug 22;185(4):166-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809765.
5
Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.剂量降低对数字化全景X线摄影中标准化透光性病变可检测性的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Aug;86(2):227-33. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90130-5.
6
Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.基于胶片和数字全景X线摄影的质量。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jan;33(1):32-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17777906.
7
GafChromic XR-QA film in testing panoramic dental radiography.在全景牙科X线摄影检测中使用影可尼XR-QA胶片。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007 Apr 19;8(2):110-3. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i2.2457.
8
Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.五种全景屏-片组合的诊断质量与患者辐射剂量对比
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986 Apr;61(4):409-11. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90428-7.
9
Quality assurance in orthodontic radiography.口腔正畸影像学中的质量保证
Br J Orthod. 1995 Feb;22(1):78-84. doi: 10.1179/bjo.22.1.78.
10
Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.一种新型数字全景系统的评估:与胶片的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001 Mar;30(2):98-100. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600583.