The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
作者信息
Redleaf D L, Schmitt S B, Thompson W C
出版信息
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 May;31(5):913-45.
PMID:10243334
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 May;31(5):913-45.
2
The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Issues Law Med. 1986 May;1(6):441-75.
3
Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.停止或撤销特别生命支持。优化权利并限制责任。
West J Med. 1984 Sep;141(3):387-94.
4
Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Fall;1(3):237-41.
5
What are the basic provisions of California's new "Right to Die Bill?".
Hosp Forum. 1976 Nov;19(6):17, 22.
6
Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.谁为无行为能力的患者代言？约瑟夫·赛克维茨的案例。
Trustee. 1978 Dec;31(12):19, 21-2, 24.
7
Life-sustaining treatment: the physician's role in decision-making.维持生命的治疗：医生在决策中的作用。
Geriatrics. 1992 Jan;47(1):68-70.
8
Right-to-die laws: creating, not clarifying, problems.
Hosp Prog. 1978 Jun;59(6):62-5, 78.
9
Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.替代同意。调和消极治疗与对常规医疗的同意。
J Leg Med. 1986 Sep;7(3):341-55. doi: 10.1080/01947648609513475.
10
Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?终止维持生命的医疗治疗：谁应行使患者的死亡权？
Health Care Superv. 1994 Jun;12(4):60-72.
引用本文的文献
1
The future prospects for living wills.
J Med Ethics. 1989 Dec;15(4):179-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.4.179.
2
Family physicians' attitudes toward advance directives.家庭医生对预立医疗指示的态度。
CMAJ. 1992 Jun 1;146(11):1937-44.
Zotero 插件