Kelley R E
Harv Bus Rev. 1979 Nov-Dec;57(6):110-20.
During the past 10 years, quietly, without much fanfare, between 250 and 500 organizations have developed an internal consultant function. Many of these consultants play similar roles to the ones traditionally played by external consultants such as troubleshooting, advising the CEO, analyzing research, and implementing new programs. Because the internal consultants can respond rapidly to organizational needs and are immediately accountable to the CEO, these functions have been successful so far. There are, however, according to this author, who has surveyed 200 internal consultants and personally interviewed many of them, areas where an external consultant still works out better. In the main these are the politically sensitive areas where an internal consultant's credibility can be too easily damaged. The author discusses other aspects of the problems that surround the internal consultant, the controversy about the merits of the outsider versus the insider, and ends his article with some guidelines for developing an in-house function.
在过去十年间,有250至500个组织悄然无息地、没有大张旗鼓地设立了内部顾问职能。这些顾问中的许多人所扮演的角色,与传统外部顾问所扮演的角色类似,比如解决问题、向首席执行官提供建议、分析研究以及实施新方案。由于内部顾问能够迅速响应组织需求,并且直接对首席执行官负责,到目前为止这些职能都很成功。然而,据这位对200名内部顾问进行过调查并亲自采访过其中许多人的作者称,在某些领域,外部顾问的工作效果仍然更好。主要是在政治敏感领域,内部顾问的信誉可能太容易受到损害。作者讨论了围绕内部顾问的其他问题方面、关于外部顾问与内部顾问优劣的争议,并在文章结尾给出了一些发展内部职能的指导方针。