Block R
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1979 Aug:40-58.
Block profiles the two unions that are the most active in organizing non-nurse health care employees: the National Hospital Union (NHU) and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The two international unions present a contrast in structure and ideology. The SEIU is a truly international, decentralized union, whereas NHU is a far more centralized affiliate. As an international union, SEIU characterizes, taxes, and disciplines locals. Its decentralized strategy has been to permit locals to do the bulk of the organizing and collective bargaining, while the national union merely coordinates and offers financial and technical support. Conversely, NHU is an affiliate of the retail, wholesale, and department store union, deriving authority from, paying tax to, and subject to discipline by the parent organization. Its centralized approach has been for national officers to determine when a district will be created and what its jurisdiction will be. The structural differences of the two unions can be traced to their respective histories. As an old-line AFL union, SEIU had an existing structure of independent local unions that operated in health care as they did in other industries. NHU, however, originated as a union of drug store employees and its structure evolved over time. Membership growth and geographic expansion elevated it beyond the status of a local into a division with its own districts. The unions also diverge in their ideology; SEIU takes a more traditional business union approach to collective bargaining and unionism, while NHU is oriented to social welfare, involving itself in more than the work aspect of members' lives. These differences again can be attributed to contrasting histories of the old-line SEIU and the more radical NHU. The authors emphasize that unions are not homogeneous entities but organizations that respond to a similar environment as a result of their respective structures and histories.
全国医院工会(NHU)和服务业员工国际工会(SEIU)。这两个国际工会在结构和意识形态方面形成了鲜明对比。SEIU是一个真正的国际化、去中心化的工会,而NHU则是一个更加集权的附属机构。作为一个国际工会,SEIU对地方分会进行定性、征税并实施纪律约束。其去中心化策略是允许地方分会进行大部分的组织工作和集体谈判,而全国性工会仅进行协调并提供资金和技术支持。相反,NHU是零售、批发和百货商店工会的附属机构,从母组织获取权力、向其纳税并接受其纪律约束。其集权方式是由全国性官员决定何时设立一个地区以及其管辖范围是什么。这两个工会的结构差异可以追溯到它们各自的历史。作为一个老牌的美国劳工联合会工会,SEIU拥有独立地方工会的现有结构,这些地方工会在医疗保健领域的运作方式与在其他行业相同。然而,NHU起源于药店员工工会,其结构随着时间的推移而演变。会员人数的增长和地域的扩张使其地位从一个地方工会提升为一个拥有自己地区的部门。这两个工会在意识形态上也存在分歧;SEIU在集体谈判和工会主义方面采取更为传统的商业工会方法,而NHU则以社会福利为导向,不仅关注会员生活的工作方面。这些差异同样可以归因于老牌的SEIU和更为激进的NHU截然不同的历史。作者强调,工会并非同质化的实体,而是由于各自的结构和历史而对类似环境做出反应的组织。