• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健行业的公司重组:劳动法方面的影响。

Corporate reorganization in the health care industry: the labor law implications.

作者信息

Fries J R

出版信息

Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1986 Sep-Oct;31(5):110-26.

PMID:10280906
Abstract

Health care mergers, acquisitions, or the creation of new subsidiaries or satellite facilities have significant labor law implications. The National Labor Relations Board may disregard the independent corporate status of two related entities. Such "single employer" status may make a health care organization more susceptible to union organizing, to labor disputes, or to monetary liability for unfair labor practices. The Board may also allow employees at independent facilities of a single employer to organize and bargain as a single unit. Such a multifacility unit may result in employees of small outlying facilities being organized against their wishes. Similarly, the unit accretion theory of the Board allows employees of a newly acquired or newly created small facility to be merged into a larger, existing bargaining unit without an opportunity for an election. Finally, a health institution that acquires or merges with another facility may be obligated to assume and honor an existing union contract. Alternatively, the "successor" may be required to bargain with the union, but not to assume the union's contract. With the proper planning, however, the employer may have no obligation either to bargain or to assume the contract. The successor employer must also be concerned with its liability for unfair labor practices of the seller.

摘要

医疗保健行业的合并、收购,或新子公司或卫星设施的设立,都具有重大的劳动法影响。美国国家劳动关系委员会可能会无视两个相关实体的独立公司地位。这种“单一雇主”地位可能会使医疗保健组织更容易受到工会组织活动、劳动纠纷或因不公平劳动行为而产生的金钱责任的影响。该委员会还可能允许单一雇主独立设施的员工作为一个单一单位进行组织和谈判。这样一个多设施单位可能会导致偏远小设施的员工违背自己的意愿被组织起来。同样,该委员会的单位合并理论允许新收购或新设立的小设施的员工在没有选举机会的情况下被并入一个更大的现有谈判单位。最后,收购或与另一设施合并的医疗机构可能有义务承担并遵守现有的工会合同。或者,“继任者”可能被要求与工会进行谈判,但不必承担工会的合同。然而,通过适当的规划,雇主可能既没有谈判的义务,也没有承担合同的义务。继任雇主还必须关注其对卖方不公平劳动行为的责任。

相似文献

1
Corporate reorganization in the health care industry: the labor law implications.医疗保健行业的公司重组:劳动法方面的影响。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1986 Sep-Oct;31(5):110-26.
2
Changing corporate structures--from reorganizations to mergers.改变公司结构——从重组到合并。
Top Health Care Financ. 1985 Fall;12(1):38-46.
3
Union elections and the NLRB. The healthcare industry continues to challenge bargaining unit determinations.工会选举与美国国家劳资关系委员会。医疗行业继续对谈判单位的确定提出质疑。
Health Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;71(1):96-101.
4
Health care institution labor law: case law developments, 1974-78.《医疗机构劳动法:判例法发展,1974 - 1978年》
Am J Law Med. 1978 Spring;4(1):1-14.
5
Judicial review of NLRB rulemaking in the health care industry: implications for labor and management.美国国家劳资关系委员会(NLRB)在医疗行业制定规则的司法审查:对劳资双方的影响
Employee Relat Law J. 1990;16(3):333-6.
6
Mergers and acquisitions in the health care industry: labor and human resource issues.医疗保健行业的并购:劳动力与人力资源问题
J Health Hosp Law. 1989 Oct;22(10):317-25.
7
Preparing for increased union organizing. A commitment to deal justly with employees is the best response to the new bargaining unit rules.为增加工会组织活动做好准备。致力于公正对待员工是应对新的谈判单位规则的最佳回应。
Health Prog. 1991 Oct;72(8):18-9, 23.
8
Health care labor relations law--understanding the issues.医疗保健劳动关系法——理解相关问题。
Employee Relat Law J. 1981 Autumn;7(2):235-50.
9
Physician unions: any doctor can join, but who can bargain collectively?医师工会:任何医生都可以加入,但谁能进行集体谈判呢?
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1990 Fall;35(3):327-40.
10
Unionization in the hospital industry: how are wages affected?医院行业的工会化:工资受到怎样的影响?
Healthc Financ Manage. 1985 Aug;39(8):30-5.