• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NLRB's St. Francis decision signals broader-based bargaining units.

作者信息

Furlane M E, Freeman C A

出版信息

Health Prog. 1985 May;66(4):50-3.

PMID:10271499
Abstract

The number of potentially appropriate bargaining units in a hospital has been sharply reduced by the National Labor Relations Board's recent St. Francis decision. Following a series of rejections by the U.S. Courts of Appeals, the NLRB has abandoned its previous position and adopted new standards that it believes are more in keeping with Congress' directive to prevent the proliferation of bargaining units in the health care industry. The new standards require that there be unusually sharp differences between the wages, hours, working conditions, etc., of employees requesting a separate bargaining unit and those in an overall professional or nonprofessional unit. As a result, hospital bargaining units will become much more broadly based. The St. Francis decision does not, however, invalidate previous NLRB certification or relieve a hospital of established bargaining obligations. To establish the appropriateness of broader based units, employers can ensure that employees in such a proposed unit are covered by a centrally administered wage and salary program with common wage scales, labor grades, pay increments, and job performance evaluation standards. Functional integration, continuing education and training, job transfers, shared facilities and activities, and centralized personnel policies and procedures are also areas in which employees' mutuality of interest can be established, thereby supporting the creation or maintenance of broad units.

摘要

相似文献

1
NLRB's St. Francis decision signals broader-based bargaining units.
Health Prog. 1985 May;66(4):50-3.
2
Union elections and the NLRB. The healthcare industry continues to challenge bargaining unit determinations.工会选举与美国国家劳资关系委员会。医疗行业继续对谈判单位的确定提出质疑。
Health Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;71(1):96-101.
3
The NLRB decisions on appropriate bargaining units.
Hosp Prog. 1975 Aug;56(8):43-6, 69.
4
The prospects for multifacility bargaining units in the health-care industry.医疗行业多机构谈判单位的前景。
Employee Relat Law J. 1987 Autumn;13(2):322-38.
5
Determining appropriate healthcare bargaining units: NLRB's historic rule making move.确定合适的医疗保健谈判单位:美国国家劳动关系委员会具有历史意义的规则制定举措。
Case Stud Health Adm. 1987;6:157-65.
6
Judicial review of NLRB rulemaking in the health care industry: implications for labor and management.美国国家劳资关系委员会(NLRB)在医疗行业制定规则的司法审查:对劳资双方的影响
Employee Relat Law J. 1990;16(3):333-6.
7
Nurses and the new NLRB rules. Implications for healthcare management.护士与美国国家劳资关系委员会的新规定。对医疗管理的影响。
Health Prog. 1991 Oct;72(8):20-2.
8
NLRB enunciates two-tier test for determining appropriateness of bargaining units in health care field.美国国家劳资关系委员会阐明了用于确定医疗保健领域谈判单位适当性的两级测试。
Health Law Vigil. 1983 Jan 21;6(2):3-5.
9
NLRB proposed rules for determining health care bargaining units.美国国家劳资关系委员会提出了确定医疗保健谈判单位的规则。
Employee Relat Law J. 1989 Spring;14(4):627-32.
10
Health care institution labor law: case law developments, 1974-78.《医疗机构劳动法:判例法发展,1974 - 1978年》
Am J Law Med. 1978 Spring;4(1):1-14.