• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗技术的传播:一个“囚徒困境”陷阱?

The diffusion of medical technology: a "prisoner's dilemma" trap?

作者信息

Benjamini Y, Gafni A

出版信息

Socioecon Plann Sci. 1986;20(2):69-74. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90029-7.

DOI:10.1016/0038-0121(86)90029-7
PMID:10276533
Abstract

Medical technology diffusion and its effect on the modern hospital and on the rising costs of medical care is an issue which receives considerable attention from economists and policy analysts. In this paper a different approach is used to understand this phenomenon. We present the decision of a single hospital, whether or not to adopt an advanced technology system, using the concept of a noncooperative, nonzero sum game. Such presentation provides us with more insight on the conflict in which hospitals find themselves; the "catch" which pushes them to purchase more and more sophisticated and expensive technology in the hope that they will be able to successfully compete with other hospitals. The situation is further complicated by the existence of another "hidden" player--society, whose goals may differ from those of any individual hospital and even from the collective interests of the hospital sector. Possible conflicts that may exist and suggested solutions for each participant are presented and their policy implication are discussed.

摘要

医疗技术的传播及其对现代医院和医疗成本上升的影响是一个受到经济学家和政策分析师相当关注的问题。在本文中,我们采用了一种不同的方法来理解这一现象。我们运用非合作、非零和博弈的概念,展示了一家医院关于是否采用先进技术系统的决策。这样的展示让我们对医院所处的冲突有了更多的洞察;这种“困境”促使它们购买越来越复杂和昂贵的技术,以期能够成功地与其他医院竞争。另一个“隐藏”参与者——社会的存在,使情况变得更加复杂,社会的目标可能不同于任何一家医院的目标,甚至不同于医院行业的集体利益。本文呈现了可能存在的冲突以及针对每个参与者的建议解决方案,并讨论了它们的政策含义。

相似文献

1
The diffusion of medical technology: a "prisoner's dilemma" trap?医疗技术的传播:一个“囚徒困境”陷阱?
Socioecon Plann Sci. 1986;20(2):69-74. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90029-7.
2
Medical technology and health expenditure: an economic review and a proposal.医疗技术与卫生支出:一项经济综述及建议
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1986 Jul-Sep;1(4):253-73. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740010403.
3
Medical ethics, logic traps, and game theory: an illustrative tale of brain death.医学伦理、逻辑陷阱与博弈论:一个关于脑死亡的例证故事
J Med Ethics. 2004 Aug;30(4):359-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002667.
4
Difference of reciprocity effect in two coevolutionary models of presumed two-player and multiplayer games.假定的两人及多人博弈的两种协同进化模型中互惠效应的差异。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jun;87(6):062136. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.062136. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
5
Evolving continuous behaviors in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.迭代囚徒困境中不断演变的连续行为。
Biosystems. 1996;37(1-2):135-45. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(95)01550-7.
6
Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.空间囚徒困境博弈中的社会多样性与合作促进
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Jan;77(1 Pt 1):011904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.011904. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
7
Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on evolving random networks.演化随机网络上的进化囚徒困境
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Apr;89(4):042142. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042142. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
8
Interaction times change evolutionary outcomes: Two-player matrix games.交互时间改变进化结果:双人矩阵博弈
J Theor Biol. 2017 Mar 7;416:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Medical technology and professional dominance theory.医学技术与专业主导理论。
Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(10):809-17. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90148-5.
10
Evolutionary stability in the n-person iterated prisoner's dilemma.n人重复囚徒困境中的进化稳定性
Biosystems. 1996;37(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(95)01558-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Savings Accounts will not advance Canadian health care objectives.医疗储蓄账户不会推进加拿大的医疗保健目标。
CMAJ. 2002 Jul 23;167(2):152-3.