Umbdenstock R J
Health Prog. 1987 Jan-Feb;68(1):44-9.
The governing board's role in health care is not changing, but new competitive forces necessitate a refinement of the board's approach to fulfilling its role. In a free-standing, community, not-for-profit hospital, the board functions as though it were the "owner." Although it does not truly own the facility in the legal sense, the board does have legal, fiduciary, and financial responsibilities conferred on it by the state. In a religious-sponsored facility, the board fulfills these same obligations on behalf of the sponsoring institute, subject to the institute's reserved powers. In multi-institutional systems, the hospital board's power and authority depend on the role granted it by the system. Boards in all types of facilities are currently faced with the following challenges: Fulfilling their basic responsibilities, such as legal requirements, financial duties, and obligations for the quality of care. Encouraging management and the board itself to "think strategically" in attacking new competitive market forces while protecting the organization's traditional mission and values. Assessing recommended strategies in light of consequences if constituencies think the organization is abandoning its commitments. Boards can take several steps to match their mode of operation with the challenges of the new environment. Boards must rededicate themselves to the hospital's mission. Trustees must expand their understanding of health care trends and issues and their effect on the organization. Boards must evaluate and help strengthen management's performance, rather than acting as a "watchdog" in an adversarial position. Boards must think strategically, rather than focusing solely on operational details. Boards must evaluate the methods they use for conducting business.
治理委员会在医疗保健领域的角色并未改变,但新的竞争力量使得委员会履行其职责的方式需要加以完善。在一家独立的社区非营利性医院中,委员会发挥着类似“所有者”的作用。尽管从法律意义上讲它并非真正拥有该机构,但委员会确实承担着州赋予它的法律、信托和财务责任。在宗教赞助的机构中,委员会代表赞助机构履行同样的义务,但需服从该机构保留的权力。在多机构系统中,医院委员会的权力和权威取决于系统赋予它的角色。目前,各类机构中的委员会都面临以下挑战:履行其基本职责,如法律要求、财务职责以及对医疗质量的义务;鼓励管理层和委员会自身在应对新的竞争市场力量时“进行战略思考”,同时保护组织的传统使命和价值观;根据选民认为该组织正在背弃其承诺时的后果来评估推荐的战略。委员会可以采取若干措施,使其运作模式与新环境的挑战相匹配。委员会必须重新致力于医院的使命。受托人必须扩大对医疗保健趋势和问题及其对组织影响的理解。委员会必须评估并帮助加强管理层的绩效,而不是以对抗的姿态充当“监督者”。委员会必须进行战略思考,而不是仅仅关注运营细节。委员会必须评估其开展业务所采用的方法。