• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优选提供者组织、价格固定与《谢尔曼法》第一条

Preferred provider organizations, price-fixing and Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

作者信息

Bluhm R J

出版信息

Health Matrix. 1987 Fall;5(3):9-16.

PMID:10285386
Abstract

The economic forces that bring the products of any market to fruition cannot proceed through history unrestrained. Society must maintain a sense of control over its economic market if the fruits of this market are to benefit all. The two forms of control that society has sought to apply in the past are (1) procompetitive restrictions and (2) anticompetitive regulations. The health care industry, however, is one which traditionally has been exempt from these private market restrictions. Throughout its history, the health care industry has discouraged its members from engaging in competition. For years, the industry had been allowed to develop its own peculiar "guild" system of economics. Today, this system is being challenged by proponents of a more traditional "market" approach. Under this new approach, a competitive market determines prices, encourages efficiency, maintains quality and spurs innovation. A response to this procompetitive system has been the advent of Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs). Preferred Provider Organizations have rapidly increased in number in response to soaring health care costs. Government antitrust enforcement agencies have encouraged the growth of PPOs because they help bring needed competition to the health care field. A problem with the "encouragement" is that it frequently runs amuck of antitrust regulations. In these situations, one should look at whether there is agreement with Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

摘要

促使任何市场产品得以实现的经济力量,在历史进程中不可能不受限制地发展。如果市场成果要惠及所有人,社会就必须对其经济市场保持一种控制感。社会过去试图采用的两种控制形式是:(1)促进竞争的限制措施和(2)反竞争的监管规定。然而,医疗保健行业传统上一直不受这些私人市场限制的约束。在其整个历史中,医疗保健行业一直不鼓励其成员参与竞争。多年来,该行业一直被允许发展其独特的“行会”经济体系。如今,这种体系正受到更传统“市场”方法支持者的挑战。在这种新方法下,竞争市场决定价格、鼓励效率、维持质量并刺激创新。对这种促进竞争体系的一种回应是优选提供者组织(PPO)的出现。由于医疗保健成本飙升,优选提供者组织的数量迅速增加。政府反垄断执法机构鼓励PPO的发展,因为它们有助于给医疗保健领域带来所需的竞争。这种“鼓励”存在的一个问题是,它经常违反反垄断法规。在这些情况下,人们应该审视是否符合《谢尔曼法》第一条的规定。

相似文献

1
Preferred provider organizations, price-fixing and Section 1 of the Sherman Act.优选提供者组织、价格固定与《谢尔曼法》第一条
Health Matrix. 1987 Fall;5(3):9-16.
2
Preferred provider organizations and antitrust policy: some recent issues.优选提供者组织与反垄断政策:近期若干问题
Health Matrix. 1986 Summer;4(2):22-5.
3
Are PPOs a competitive force or antitrust risk?优先提供者组织(PPO)是一种竞争力量还是反托拉斯风险?
Healthc Financ Manage. 1986 May;40(5):52-60.
4
The development of preferred provider organizations and its antitrust implications.
J Med Pract Manage. 1985 Oct;1(2):130-5.
5
Perspectives. PPOs face antitrust problems.
Wash Rep Med Health. 1984 Nov 5;38(44):suppl 4p.
6
An assessment of the anticompetitive effects of preferred provider organizations.对优选提供者组织的反竞争效应的评估。
Inquiry. 1987 Winter;24(4):384-91.
7
The FTC and provider-controlled PPO price negotiations.
Health Law Vigil. 1988 Jan 29;11(3):6-10.
8
Federal antitrust agencies send mixed signals to PPOs.联邦反垄断机构向优先提供者组织发出了相互矛盾的信号。
Health Care Law Newsl. 1986 Jul;1(1):12-4.
9
Antitrust and the new competition in health care: excerpts.
Med Prod Sales. 1986 Apr;17(4):39-42.
10
Proposed FTC consent order first to prohibit PPO price-fixing and concerted negotiations.
Health Law Vigil. 1988 Jan 15;11(2):9-10, 14.