道德困境：杀人还是任其死亡？
Moral dilemma: to kill or allow to die?
作者信息
Cole J J
出版信息
Death Stud. 1989;13(4):393-406. doi: 10.1080/07481188908252317.
PMID:10294100
Abstract
The thesis of this paper is that while allowing a person to die with care can be morally justified in particular cases, the option of mercy killing can never be morally defended. There is a significant moral difference between these two concepts. Furthermore, the wedge argument, the medical fallibility argument, and the medical care and trust argument provide cogent and convincing reasons for maintaining a legal distinction between mercy killing and letting a person die.
摘要
本文的论点是，虽然在某些特定情况下，允许一个人在关怀中离世在道德上是合理的，但安乐死的选择在道德上永远无法得到辩护。这两个概念之间存在重大的道德差异。此外，滑坡论证、医疗失误论证以及医疗护理与信任论证为在法律上区分安乐死和任由一个人死亡提供了有力且令人信服的理由。
相似文献
1
Moral dilemma: to kill or allow to die?道德困境：杀人还是任其死亡？
Death Stud. 1989;13(4):393-406. doi: 10.1080/07481188908252317.
2
Doctors must not kill.医生不得杀人。
J Clin Ethics. 1992 Summer;3(2):95-102.
3
Euthanasia.安乐死。
Yale J Biol Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;65(2):121-9.
4
Letting die and mercy killing.听任死亡与安乐死。
Med Etika Bioet. 2003 Autumn-Winter;10(3-4):2-7.
5
Voluntary active euthanasia.自愿主动安乐死。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Mar-Apr;22(2):10-22.
6
The ethical standards for withholding/withdrawing nutrition and hydration.停止/撤除营养与水分支持的伦理标准。
Issues Law Med. 1986 Sep;2(2):87-97.
7
"The song of death: the lyrics of euthanasia".
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993;9:1-76.
8
Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die.安乐死、效率以及杀害患者与任由患者死亡之间的历史区别。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):220-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013839.
9
The theologic ethics of euthanasia.安乐死的神学伦理学
Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jan-Feb;19(1):S19-22.
10
Perimortal initiatives: issues in foregoing life-sustaining treatment, suicide, and assisted suicide.濒死之际的举措：放弃维持生命治疗、自杀及协助自杀相关问题
Issues Law Med. 1987 Summer;3(1):29-35.
Zotero 插件