Stevenson R H
Eval Health Prof. 1984 Jun;7(2):157-80. doi: 10.1177/016327878400700203.
This report analyzes the complexities of evaluating prevention, remediation, and rehabilitation treatments for cardiovascular disease. A comparison of treatments revealed that distinct differences exist in terms of motivation of subjects to participate and steps required for a maximum treatment effect. Large-scale prevention programs are generally the most complex of all interventions to complete. If complex health programs are initially subdivided into their detailed planning and implementation steps, proper assessments of each step will lead to a much less difficult comprehensive evaluation.
本报告分析了评估心血管疾病预防、补救和康复治疗的复杂性。治疗方法的比较显示，在受试者参与的动机以及实现最大治疗效果所需的步骤方面存在明显差异。大规模预防项目通常是所有干预措施中最复杂的。如果将复杂的健康项目最初细分为详细的规划和实施步骤，对每个步骤进行适当评估将使综合评估的难度大大降低。
