• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密歇根医疗补助药品目录中选定药品的淘汰:一项案例研究

The elimination of selected drug products from the Michigan Medicaid formulary: a case study.

作者信息

Smith D M, McKercher P L

出版信息

Hosp Formul. 1984 May;19(5):366-72.

PMID:10299510
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prescribing behavior, recipient response, and economic impact of the removal of selected prescription drug products from the Michigan Medicaid formulary. The frequency with which alternate legend drugs were prescribed and the frequency of continuous therapy via out-of-pocket cash were determined. From 17 independent Michigan pharmacies, a total of 137 patients with prescriptions for at least one eliminated drug product was identified. Of the Medicaid recipients on continuous therapy, 46% discontinued therapy. Over 23% had an alternate legend drug prescribed still covered under the Medicaid drug benefit. The alternate drug resulted in significantly higher acquisition costs. Over 30% of the recipients continued therapy at their own expense, representing a cost savings to the Medicaid program.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估从密歇根医疗补助药品目录中移除某些处方药产品后的处方行为、接受者反应及经济影响。确定了替代处方药的处方频率以及通过自付现金进行持续治疗的频率。从密歇根州17家独立药房中,共识别出137名至少有一种被淘汰药品处方的患者。在接受持续治疗的医疗补助接受者中,46%停止了治疗。超过23%的患者开具了仍在医疗补助药品福利范围内的替代处方药。替代药物导致采购成本显著更高。超过30%的接受者自费继续治疗,这为医疗补助计划节省了成本。

相似文献

1
The elimination of selected drug products from the Michigan Medicaid formulary: a case study.密歇根医疗补助药品目录中选定药品的淘汰:一项案例研究
Hosp Formul. 1984 May;19(5):366-72.
2
Impact of Maine's Medicaid drug formulary change on non-Medicaid markets: spillover effects of a restrictive drug formulary.缅因州医疗补助药品处方集变更对非医疗补助市场的影响:限制性药品处方集的溢出效应
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Oct;9(10):686-96.
3
Controlling prescription drug expenditures: a report of success.控制处方药支出:一份成功报告。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Aug;13(8):473-80.
4
Washington State CARE Project: downstream cost changes associated with the provision of cognitive services by pharmacists.华盛顿州关怀项目:药剂师提供认知服务相关的下游成本变化
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1999 Sep-Oct;39(5):650-7.
5
Prescription drug formulary design, preferred-product marketshare, and formulary noncompliance: a study of proton-pump inhibitors.处方药处方集设计、首选产品市场份额与处方集不依从性:质子泵抑制剂研究
Manag Care Interface. 2005 Aug;18(8):39-45.
6
The ripple effects of a restrictive Medicaid formulary.限制性医疗补助药品目录的连锁反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Oct;9(10):648-9.
7
Do drug formulary policies reflect evidence of value?药品处方集政策是否反映了价值证据?
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Jan;12(1):30-6.
8
Use of a Medicaid database to analyze pharmaceutical services in long-term-care facilities.利用医疗补助数据库分析长期护理机构中的药物服务。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Jun;43(6):1467-72.
9
Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly: what the experience of Medicaid and other insurance programs means for a Medicare drug benefit.老年人增加使用仿制药可能带来的节省:医疗补助计划及其他保险计划的经验对医疗保险药品福利意味着什么。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Apr;13(4):207-14. doi: 10.1002/pds.872.
10
Copayment for pharmaceutical services in a Medicaid program.医疗补助计划中药物服务的自付费用。
Contemp Pharm Pract. 1980 Winter;3(1):37-42.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do US Gastroenterologists Use Over-the-Counter and Prescription Medications in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux and Chronic Constipation?美国胃肠病学家如何在胃食管反流和慢性便秘患者中使用非处方药和处方药?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;110(11):1516-25. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.156. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
2
Making a case for employing a societal perspective in the evaluation of Medicaid prescription drug interventions.主张在评估医疗补助处方药干预措施时采用社会视角。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(4):281-96. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826040-00002.
3
Pharmaceutical policies in Canada. Issues and challenges.
加拿大的药品政策。问题与挑战。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14 Suppl 1:81-96. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814001-00011.
4
Impact of selective financing of drugs on pharmaceutical expenditure control in the province of Valladolid, Spain.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Sep;10(3):269-80. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610030-00008.
5
Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.机构处方集:药物经济学分析与处方集决策的相关性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Apr;1(4):265-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201040-00004.
6
Delisting of drugs in Ontario. How attitudes and prescribing strategies of family physicians in the Kingston area changed.安大略省的药品退市。金斯顿地区家庭医生的态度和处方策略如何变化。
Can Fam Physician. 1996 Jul;42:1309-16.