Suppr超能文献

参加“风险”健康维护组织(HMO)的医疗保险受益人的预注册报销模式。

Pre-enrollment reimbursement patterns of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in "at-risk" HMOs.

作者信息

Eggers P W, Prihoda R

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1982 Sep;4(1):55-73.

Abstract

The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has initiated several demonstration projects to encourage HMOs to participate in the Medicare program under a risk mechanism. These demonstrations are designed to test innovative marketing techniques, benefit packages, and reimbursement levels. HCFA's current method for prospective payments to HMOs is based on the Adjusted Average Per Capita Cost (AAPCC). An important issue in prospective reimbursement is the extent to which the AAPCC adequately reflects the risk factors which arise out of the selection process of Medicare beneficiaries into HMOs. This study examines the pre-enrollment reimbursement experience of Medicare beneficiaries who enrolled in the demonstration HMOs to determine whether or not a non-random selection process took place. The results of this study suggest that the AAPCC may not be an adequate mechanism for setting prospective reimbursement rates. The Marshfield results further suggest that the type of HMO may have an influence on the selection process among Medicare beneficiaries. If Medicare beneficiaries do not have to change providers to join an HMO, as in an IPA model or a staff model which includes most of the providers in an area, the selection process may be more likely to result in an unbiased risk group.

摘要

医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)已启动了多个示范项目,以鼓励健康维护组织(HMO)在风险机制下参与医疗保险计划。这些示范项目旨在测试创新的营销技巧、福利套餐和报销水平。HCFA目前向前瞻性支付HMO的方法是基于调整后的人均成本(AAPCC)。前瞻性报销中的一个重要问题是AAPCC在多大程度上充分反映了医疗保险受益人进入HMO的选择过程中产生的风险因素。本研究考察了参加示范HMO的医疗保险受益人的参保前报销经历,以确定是否发生了非随机选择过程。本研究结果表明,AAPCC可能不是设定前瞻性报销率的适当机制。马什菲尔德的结果进一步表明,HMO的类型可能会对医疗保险受益人之间的选择过程产生影响。如果医疗保险受益人无需更换医疗服务提供者即可加入HMO,如独立执业协会(IPA)模式或包含某地区大多数医疗服务提供者的员工模式,那么选择过程可能更有可能产生一个无偏差的风险群体。

引用本文的文献

1
How successful is Medicare Advantage?
Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):351-94. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12061.
2
Risk selection, risk adjustment and choice: concepts and lessons from the Americas.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 25;10(11):5299-332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115299.
3
New risk-adjustment system was associated with reduced favorable selection in medicare advantage.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2630-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1344.
5
An economic history of Medicare part C.
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):289-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00629.x.
6
Do Medicare Advantage enrollees tend to be admitted to hospitals with better or worse outcomes compared with fee-for-service enrollees?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010 Jun;10(2):171-85. doi: 10.1007/s10754-010-9076-0. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
7
Using a Spanish surname match to improve identification of Hispanic women in Medicare administrative data.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 1):1469-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00550.x.
8
The magnitude and nature of risk selection in employer-sponsored health plans.
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1817-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00320.x.
9
Multiple prior years of health expenditures and Medicare health plan choice.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Sep;4(3):247-61. doi: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000036049.40865.72.
10
Patient selection in the ESRD managed care demonstration.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2003 Summer;24(4):31-43.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验