• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的风险调整系统与医疗保险优势中有利选择的减少有关。

New risk-adjustment system was associated with reduced favorable selection in medicare advantage.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2630-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1344.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1344
PMID:23213147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3538078/
Abstract

Health plans participating in the Medicare managed care program, called Medicare Advantage since 2003, have historically attracted healthier enrollees than has the traditional fee-for-service program. Medicare Advantage plans have gained financially from this favorable risk selection since their payments have traditionally been adjusted only minimally for clinical characteristics of enrollees, causing overpayment for healthier enrollees and underpayment for sicker ones. As a result, a new risk-adjustment system was phased in from 2004 to 2007, and a lock-in provision instituted to limit midyear disenrollment by enrollees experiencing health declines whose exodus could benefit plans financially. To determine whether these reforms were associated with intended reductions in risk selection, we compared differences in self-reported health care use and health between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare beneficiaries before versus after these reforms were implemented. We similarly compared differences between those who switched into or out of Medicare Advantage and nonswitchers. Most differences in 2001-03 were substantially narrowed by 2006-07, suggesting reduced selection. Similar risk-adjustment methods may help reduce incentives for plans competing in health insurance exchanges and accountable care organizations to select patients with favorable clinical risks.

摘要

自 2003 年以来,参与医疗保险管理式医疗计划(即医疗保险优势计划)的健康计划吸引了比传统按服务收费计划更健康的参保者。由于医疗保险优势计划的支付仅对参保者的临床特征进行最小程度的调整,导致对更健康的参保者过度支付,对病情较重的参保者支付不足,因此从 2004 年到 2007 年逐步实施了新的风险调整系统,并制定了锁定规定,以限制因健康状况下降而中途退出的参保者退保,因为他们的离开可能对计划的财务状况有利。为了确定这些改革是否与预期减少风险选择有关,我们比较了这些改革实施前后医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险受益人的自我报告的医疗保健使用情况和健康状况差异。我们还比较了那些转换或不转换医疗保险优势计划的受益人的差异。到 2006-07 年,2001-03 年的大多数差异大大缩小,表明选择减少。类似的风险调整方法可能有助于减少参与医疗保险交易所和问责制医疗组织的计划选择具有有利临床风险的患者的激励措施。

相似文献

1
New risk-adjustment system was associated with reduced favorable selection in medicare advantage.新的风险调整系统与医疗保险优势中有利选择的减少有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2630-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1344.
2
Steps to reduce favorable risk selection in medicare advantage largely succeeded, boding well for health insurance exchanges.降低医疗保险优势中有利风险选择的步骤在很大程度上取得了成功,这为医疗保险交易所带来了良好的前景。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2618-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0345.
3
Impact of continued biased disenrollment from the Medicare Advantage Program to fee-for-service.医疗保险优待计划持续向按服务收费模式倾斜导致的参保人数减少的影响。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Jan 30;2(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.04.a08. eCollection 2012.
4
Favorable Risk Selection in Medicare Advantage: Trends in Mortality and Plan Exits Among Nursing Home Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划中的有利风险选择:疗养院受益人的死亡率和计划退出趋势
Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Dec;74(6):736-749. doi: 10.1177/1077558716662565. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
5
Getting What We Pay For: How Do Risk-Based Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans Compare with Alternative Measures of Beneficiary Health Risk?物有所值:基于风险的医疗保险优势计划支付与受益人的健康风险替代指标相比如何?
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4997-5015. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12977. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
The impact of the affordable care Act (ACA) on favorable risk selection and Beneficiaries' health status in Medicare advantage: a preliminary assessment.《平价医疗法案》(ACA)对医疗保险优势计划中有利风险选择和受益人群健康状况的影响:初步评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1663-4.
7
Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Enrollees Report Less Positive Experiences Than Their Medicare Advantage Counterparts.医疗保险处方药计划参保者报告的积极体验少于医疗保险优势计划的参保者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):456-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0816.
8
Favorable selection, risk adjustment, and the Medicare Advantage program.有利选择、风险调整与医疗保险优势计划。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):1039-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12006. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Did Medicare Advantage payment cuts affect beneficiary access and affordability?医疗保险优势计划的支付削减是否影响了受益人的就医机会和支付能力?
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Sep 1;25(9):e261-e266.
10
Analysis Of Medicare Advantage HMOs compared with traditional Medicare shows lower use of many services during 2003-09.分析 2003-09 年期间医疗保险优势 HMO 与传统医疗保险相比的数据显示,前者在许多服务的使用上较低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec;31(12):2609-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0179.

引用本文的文献

1
Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment.改善医疗保险风险调整公平性的算法
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252640. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2640.
2
Differences in Initiation and Receipt of Home Health Care: Traditional Medicare Versus Medicare Advantage.家庭医疗保健起始与接受情况的差异:传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划对比
Med Care. 2025 Jul 1;63(7):487-494. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002150. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
3
Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment.改善医疗保险风险调整公平性的算法
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 27:2025.01.25.25321057. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.25.25321057.
4
High-Cost Cancer Drug Use in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中高成本癌症药物的使用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jan 3;6(1):e244868. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4868.
5
Postacute Care Services Use and Outcomes Among Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.传统 Medicare 和 Medicare Advantage 受益人的急性后期护理服务使用和结果。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Aug 4;4(8):e232517. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2517.
6
Use of High-Risk Medications Among Older Adults Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans vs Traditional Medicare.老年人在参加 Medicare Advantage 计划与传统 Medicare 计划之间使用高风险药物的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2320583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20583.
7
Effects of Medicare Advantage on preventive care use and health behavior.医疗保险优势对预防保健利用和健康行为的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):569-578. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14089. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Variations in Medicare Advantage Switching Rates Among African American and Hispanic Medicare Beneficiaries With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias, by Sex and Dual Eligibility.医疗保险优势计划转换率在有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的非裔美国人和西班牙裔医疗保险受益人性别和双重资格方面的差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Dec 29;77(12):e279-e287. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac132.
9
Evaluation of Spending Differences Between Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Shared Savings Program.评估医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险储蓄计划中受益人的支出差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28529.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to and enrollment in high-quality Medicare Advantage plans.医疗保险优势计划在获取和参与方面的种族和民族差异。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):303-313. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13977. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program.风险选择如何应对风险调整?来自医疗保险优势计划的新证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Oct;104(10):3335-64. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.10.3335.
2
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; standards related to reinsurance, risk corridors, and risk adjustment. Final rule.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》;与再保险、风险走廊和风险调整相关的标准。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Mar 23;77(57):17220-52.
3
Complex Medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors--especially those with impaired decision making.复杂的医疗保险优势选择可能会让老年人不知所措——尤其是那些决策能力受损的老年人。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1786-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission report to the Congress, March 2010.医疗保险支付咨询委员会2010年3月提交给国会的报告。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Sep;24(3):302-5. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.503732.
5
Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.使用CMS-HCC模型对医疗保险按人头付费进行风险调整。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):119-41.
6
Understanding biased selection in Medicare HMOs.了解医疗保险健康维护组织中的偏向性选择。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):961-92. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00156.
7
Selection experiences in Medicare HMOs: pre-enrollment expenditures.医疗保险健康维护组织中的选择经历:参保前支出
Health Care Financ Rev. 1999 Summer;20(4):197-209.
8
Selection bias in HMOs: a review of the evidence.健康维护组织中的选择偏倚:证据综述。
Med Care Res Rev. 2000 Dec;57(4):405-39. doi: 10.1177/107755870005700402.
9
Pre-enrollment reimbursement patterns of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in "at-risk" HMOs.参加“风险”健康维护组织(HMO)的医疗保险受益人的预注册报销模式。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1982 Sep;4(1):55-73.
10
Risk differential between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled and not enrolled in an HMO.参加和未参加健康维护组织(HMO)的医疗保险受益人的风险差异。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1980 Winter;1(3):91-9.