Suppr超能文献

老年人长期护理中的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in long-term care for the elderly.

作者信息

Wilson C C, Netting F E

出版信息

Health Values. 1986 Jul-Aug;10(4):3-12.

Abstract

During the past 20 years there has been a wealth of literature on various aspects of ethical decision-making. The ethical dilemmas which confront health professionals become more and more complex as knowledge and technology expand. Professionals have more and more effect on human lives. As research provides professionals with more intervention tools, questions arise about "quality of life" and "who has the right to make life and death decisions." This paper examines the potential for ethical difficulties in long-term care settings for the elderly. Given the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to geriatric care, a variety of professionals are involved in the delivery of services in multiple settings. For the purpose of this paper, these professionals are referred to as "health professionals" since we are defining health as physical, mental, and social well-being. Case examples will be used to illustrate potential issues when health professionals intervene with elderly persons who are in difficult situations. To provide a context, five codes of ethics (ie, health educators, social workers, physicians, clinical psychologists and nurses) will be examined. Each of these health profesionals is involved in service provision to an elderly client/patient or his family in the area of long-term care. These codes will be examined in light of their historic roots.

摘要

在过去20年里,出现了大量关于伦理决策各个方面的文献。随着知识和技术的扩展,卫生专业人员面临的伦理困境变得越来越复杂。专业人员对人类生活的影响越来越大。随着研究为专业人员提供了更多的干预工具,关于“生活质量”以及“谁有权做出生死决定”的问题也随之出现。本文探讨了老年长期护理环境中出现伦理困境的可能性。鉴于老年护理需要多学科方法,多种专业人员参与到多种环境中的服务提供工作中。出于本文的目的,这些专业人员被称为“卫生专业人员”,因为我们将健康定义为身体、心理和社会福祉。将通过案例来阐述卫生专业人员对处于困境中的老年人进行干预时可能出现的问题。为提供一个背景,将审视五条伦理准则(即健康教育工作者、社会工作者、医生、临床心理学家和护士的伦理准则)。这些卫生专业人员中的每一位都在长期护理领域为老年客户/患者或其家人提供服务。将根据其历史根源来审视这些准则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验