Who is to live? A question for the economist or the doctor? - Suppr | 超能文献

Who is to live? A question for the economist or the doctor?

作者信息

Williams A

出版信息

World Hosp. 1987 Oct;23(3-4):34-6.

Abstract

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

相似文献

1

Who is to live? A question for the economist or the doctor?

World Hosp. 1987 Oct;23(3-4):34-6.

2

Health economics: tools for decision-making.

Health Soc Serv J. 1982 Feb 11;92(4783):184-6 contd.

3

Sounding Boards. What is CBA/CEA, and why are they doing this to us?共鸣板。什么是成本效益分析/成本效果分析，他们为什么要这样对我们？

N Engl J Med. 1980 Oct 16;303(16):937-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198010163031611.

4

An imprecise science ... health economics.一门不精确的科学……健康经济学。

Health Serv J. 1988 Aug 25;98(5115):968-9.

5

Life or death debate.生死辩论。

Health Serv J. 1986 Jun 26;96(5005):26.

6

When is treatment for cancer economically justified? Discussion paper.癌症治疗在何时具有经济合理性？讨论文件。

J R Soc Med. 1990 Jan;83(1):25-8. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300112.

7

Allocating resources.分配资源。

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(1):77-92. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008941.

8

Placing a value on life and limb: the role of the informed consumer.

Health Matrix. 1983 Winter;1(1):5-21.

9

The doctor's master.这位医生的导师。

N Engl J Med. 1984 Dec 13;311(24):1573-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198412133112412.

10

NICE's citizen's council: what do we ask them, and how?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的公民顾问团：我们向他们询问什么，以及如何询问？

Lancet. 2003 Sep 13;362(9387):918-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14315-2.

引用本文的文献

1

Treatment costs and priority setting in health care: A qualitative study.医疗保健中的治疗成本与优先事项设定：一项定性研究。

Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 May 6;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-6-11.

2

The relevance of health state after treatment in prioritising between different patients.治疗后健康状况在不同患者优先级排序中的相关性。

J Med Ethics. 1993 Mar;19(1):37-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.19.1.37.

3

An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE).质量调整生命年的替代方法：挽救年轻生命当量（SAVE）。

BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):875-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.875.