质量调整生命年的替代方法：挽救年轻生命当量（SAVE）。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE).

作者信息

Nord E

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):875-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.875.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.305.6858.875

PMID:1301030

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1883082/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3e8/1883082/b2d4f9646905/bmj00095-0038-a.jpg

相似文献

An alternative to QALYs: the saved young life equivalent (SAVE).质量调整生命年的替代方法：挽救年轻生命当量（SAVE）。

BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):875-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.875.

Justice and outcomes research: the ethical limits.公正与结果研究：伦理界限

J Clin Ethics. 1993 Fall;4(3):258-61.

Castigating QALYs.谴责质量调整生命年

J Med Ethics. 1989 Sep;15(3):143-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.15.3.143.

Quality-adjusted life years and the ethical values of health care.质量调整生命年与医疗保健的伦理价值。

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Feb;73(1):61-5.

QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years): a nurse's view.质量调整生命年（QALYs）：护士的视角

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993;6(5):17-23. doi: 10.1108/09526869310045822.

Rationing health care resources. Is the quality-adjusted life-year a helpful guide?医疗保健资源的分配。质量调整生命年是一个有用的指南吗？

Can Fam Physician. 1994 Jan;40:123-4, 127-8.

QALYs: some challenges.质量调整生命年：一些挑战。

Value Health. 2009 Mar;12 Suppl 1:S10-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00516.x.

Economics, QALYs and medical ethics--a health economist's perspective.经济学、质量调整生命年与医学伦理学——一位卫生经济学家的视角

Health Care Anal. 1995 Aug;3(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02197671.

Qualms about QALYs.

Lancet. 1987 May 16;1(8542):1134-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91685-0.

An alternative to QALYs: saved young life equivalent (SAVE).质量调整生命年的替代指标：挽救年轻生命当量（SAVE）。

BMJ. 1992 Nov 28;305(6865):1365-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6865.1365-c.

引用本文的文献

Health economic evaluation of gene replacement therapies: methodological issues and recommendations.基因替代疗法的卫生经济学评估：方法学问题与建议。

J Mark Access Health Policy. 2020 Oct 11;8(1):1822666. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2020.1822666.

Disability Weights for Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures in South Korea.韩国骨质疏松症及骨质疏松性骨折的失能权重

J Bone Metab. 2019 May;26(2):83-88. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2019.26.2.83. Epub 2019 May 31.

Beyond QALYs: Multi-criteria based estimation of maximum willingness to pay for health technologies.超越 QALY：基于多标准的健康技术支付意愿最大值估计。

Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;19(2):267-275. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0882-x. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for hip fractures among the elderly in Brazil.巴西老年人髋部骨折手术治疗的成本效益

Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Jan 31;50(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.01.007. eCollection 2015 Jan-Feb.

Cost-Value Analysis and the SAVE: A Work in Progress, But an Option for Localised Decision Making?成本-价值分析与SAVE：一项正在进行的工作，但能否成为本地化决策的一个选项？

Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Dec;33(12):1281-8. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0308-5.

Real economics needs to reflect real decisions: a response to Johnson.真实的经济学需要反映真实的决策：对约翰逊的回应。

Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Feb 1;30(2):133-6. doi: 10.2165/11596660-000000000-00000.

Outcome measurement in economic evaluations of public health interventions: a role for the capability approach?公共卫生干预措施经济评价中的结果测量：能力方法的作用？

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 May;7(5):2274-89. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7052274. Epub 2010 May 6.

Assessing the empirical validity of alternative multi-attribute utility measures in the maternity context.评估在孕产背景下替代多属性效用测量方法的实证有效性。

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 May 6;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-40.

Towards cost-value analysis in health care?迈向医疗保健中的成本效益分析？

Health Care Anal. 1999;7(2):167-75. doi: 10.1023/A:1009489122094.

The equivalence of numbers: the social value of avoiding health decline: an experimental Web-based study.数字的等效性：避免健康衰退的社会价值：一项基于网络的实验性研究。

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-2-3. Epub 2002 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

Who is to live? A question for the economist or the doctor?

World Hosp. 1987 Oct;23(3-4):34-6.

Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.用于经济评估的健康状态效用测量。

J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.

The significance of contextual factors in valuing health states.情境因素在健康状态评估中的意义。

Health Policy. 1989;13(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(89)90092-4.

Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states.多属性效用理论在衡量健康状态社会偏好中的应用。

Oper Res. 1982 Nov-Dec;30(6):1043-69. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043.

The validity of a visual analogue scale in determining social utility weights for health states.视觉模拟量表在确定健康状态的社会效用权重方面的有效性。

Int J Health Plann Manage. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):234-42. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740060308.

QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off.质量调整生命年与公平-效率权衡

J Health Econ. 1991 May;10(1):21-41. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90015-f.

EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway.欧洲五维度健康量表：与健康相关的生活质量测量。挪威普通公众对健康状态的估值。

Health Policy. 1991 Jun;18(1):25-36. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90141-j.

An approach to measuring and valuing health states.一种衡量和评估健康状态的方法。

Soc Sci Med Med Econ. 1981 Jun;15(2):55-65. doi: 10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8.

The measurement of hospital output.医院产出的衡量

Int J Epidemiol. 1972 Winter;1(4):361-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/1.4.361.

A general health policy model: update and applications.一种通用健康政策模型：更新与应用

Health Serv Res. 1988 Jun;23(2):203-35.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验