• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康保险实验中治疗阶段的需求。

The demand for episodes of treatment in the Health Insurance Experiment.

作者信息

Keeler E B, Rolph J E

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):337-67. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3.

DOI:10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3
PMID:10312839
Abstract

This paper analyzes claims data from the RAND Insurance Experiment, which were grouped into episodes of treatment. The insurance plans in the experiment have coinsurance and a cap on out-of-pocket spending. Using new statistical techniques to adjust for the increased sickliness of those who exceed the cap, the effects of coinsurance on cost per episode and number of episodes are estimated. Cost sharing reduced the number of episodes but had little effect on cost per episode. People in the experiment responded myopically as their current insurance status changed through the year. The price elasticity of spending was about -0.2 throughout the range of coinsurance studied. When data permit it, the study of episodes complements analyses of annual medical spending by revealing more about how decisions to spend are made within the year.

摘要

本文分析了兰德保险实验的理赔数据,这些数据被分组为治疗阶段。实验中的保险计划设有共保条款和自付费用上限。运用新的统计技术对超出上限者病情加重的情况进行调整后,估算了共保对每个治疗阶段成本及治疗阶段数量的影响。费用分摊减少了治疗阶段数量,但对每个治疗阶段的成本影响不大。随着全年当前保险状态的变化,实验中的人们反应短视。在所研究的共保范围内,支出的价格弹性约为-0.2。当数据允许时,对治疗阶段的研究通过更深入揭示全年内的支出决策方式,补充了对年度医疗支出的分析。

相似文献

1
The demand for episodes of treatment in the Health Insurance Experiment.健康保险实验中治疗阶段的需求。
J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):337-67. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3.
2
The demand for episodes of mental health services.心理健康服务的就诊需求。
J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):369-92. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90021-5.
3
Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.健康保险与医疗需求:来自一项随机试验的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 1987 Jun;77(3):251-77.
4
Out-of-Pocket Spending for Hospitalizations Among Nonelderly Adults.非老年成年人住院的自付费用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1325-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3663.
5
Healthcare Coinsurance Elasticity Coefficient Estimation Using Monthly Cross-sectional, Time-series Claims Data.使用月度横截面时间序列索赔数据估计医疗保健共保弹性系数
Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):795-801. doi: 10.1002/hec.3341. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Out-of-Pocket Costs for Advanced Imaging Across the US Private Insurance Marketplace.美国私人保险市场高级影像检查的自付费用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):607-614.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
How will medical savings accounts affect medical spending?医疗储蓄账户将如何影响医疗支出?
Inquiry. 1996 Fall;33(3):225-36.
8
Health Insurance Deductibles and Their Associations With Out-of-Pocket Spending and Affordability Barriers Among US Adults With Chronic Conditions.美国慢性病成年人的健康保险免赔额及其与自付费用和负担能力障碍的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):433-436. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8419.
9
The demand for outpatient mental health care from nonspecialty providers.非专科医疗服务提供者对门诊心理健康护理的需求。
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1987;8:211-33.
10
How cost sharing reduced medical spending of participants in the health insurance experiment.成本分担如何降低了医疗保险实验参与者的医疗支出。
JAMA. 1983;249(16):2220-7.

引用本文的文献

1
THE EFFECT OF INSURANCE COVERAGE ON PREVENTIVE CARE.保险覆盖范围对预防性医疗的影响。
Econ Inq. 2017 Jul;55(3):1452-1467. doi: 10.1111/ecin.12442. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Unraveling socioeconomic determinants of health-related behavior, reception of information, and perceptions on disease disclosure at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: did health insurance curb the disparities in the Philippines?揭示 COVID-19 大流行期间与健康相关行为、信息接收和疾病披露认知相关的社会经济决定因素:医疗保险是否遏制了菲律宾的差异?
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18264-9.
3
Externalities and Taxation of Supplemental Insurance: A Study of Medicare and Medigap.
补充保险的外部性与税收:医疗保险和医保补充保险研究
Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2019 Apr;11(2):37-73. doi: 10.1257/app.20160350.
4
The optimal co-insurance rate for outpatient drug expenses of Iranian health insured based on the data mining method.基于数据挖掘方法的伊朗医保参保人员门诊药品费用最优共付率。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 8;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02065-4.
5
Effect of no cost sharing for paediatric care on healthcare usage by household income levels: regression discontinuity design.儿童保健零自付对不同收入家庭医疗服务使用的影响:回归间断设计。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 17;13(8):e071976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071976.
6
The impact of public policy of family doctor contracting on medical expenses from the perspective of residents at community level in China.从中国社区居民视角看家庭医生签约公共政策对医疗费用的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:972904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972904. eCollection 2022.
7
Disentangling Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in Private Health Insurance.厘清私人医疗保险中的道德风险和逆向选择
J Econom. 2021 May;222(1):141-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Modelling competition in health care markets as a complex adaptive system: an agent-based framework.将医疗保健市场中的竞争建模为一个复杂适应系统:基于主体的框架。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2019 Jan 24;9(3):212-225. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2019.1569480.
9
Healthcare consumption after a change in health insurance coverage: a French quasi-natural experiment.医疗保险覆盖范围变化后的医疗保健消费:一项法国的准自然实验。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jun 11;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00275-y.
10
Do the uninsured demand less care? Evidence from Maryland's hospitals.无保险者的医疗需求是否较低?马里兰州医院的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2020 Sep;20(3):251-276. doi: 10.1007/s10754-020-09280-4. Epub 2020 Mar 6.