成本分担如何降低了医疗保险实验参与者的医疗支出。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

How cost sharing reduced medical spending of participants in the health insurance experiment.

作者信息

Keeler E B, Rolph J E

出版信息

JAMA. 1983;249(16):2220-7.

PMID:6834620

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

How cost sharing reduced medical spending of participants in the health insurance experiment.成本分担如何降低了医疗保险实验参与者的医疗支出。

JAMA. 1983;249(16):2220-7.

Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.健康保险与医疗需求：来自一项随机试验的证据。

Am Econ Rev. 1987 Jun;77(3):251-77.

Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial.兰德健康保险实验中的医疗服务使用情况。一项随机对照试验中的诊断及特定服务分析。

Med Care. 1986 Sep;24(9 Suppl):S1-87.

The demand for episodes of treatment in the Health Insurance Experiment.健康保险实验中治疗阶段的需求。

J Health Econ. 1988 Dec;7(4):337-67. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(88)90020-3.

Effects of cost sharing on physiological health, health practices, and worry.费用分担对生理健康、健康行为及焦虑情绪的影响。

Health Serv Res. 1987 Aug;22(3):279-306.

Patient cost sharing and medical expenditures for the Elderly.老年人的患者费用分担与医疗支出。

J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;45:115-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 1.

The Rand Health Insurance Experiment for children.儿童兰德健康保险实验。

Pediatrics. 1985 May;75(5):969-71.

Insurance status and access to health services among poor persons.贫困人口的保险状况与医疗服务可及性

Health Serv Res. 1993 Dec;28(5):531-41.

Effects of cost sharing in health insurance on disability days.医疗保险费用分担对残疾天数的影响。

Health Policy. 1991 Jul;18(2):131-9. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90094-e.

Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial.免费医疗能改善成年人的健康状况吗？一项随机对照试验的结果。

N Engl J Med. 1983 Dec 8;309(23):1426-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198312083092305.

引用本文的文献

How do low-income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost-sharing?《平价医疗法案》市场中的低收入参保者如何应对费用分担？

J Risk Insur. 2023 Mar;90(1):155-183. doi: 10.1111/jori.12416. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

Impact of lower co-payments on risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and BRCA testing in Japan.降低自付费用对日本降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术和BRCA检测的影响。

Arch Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;81(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01048-9.

Differential Cost-Sharing Undermines Treatment Adherence to Combination Therapy: Evidence from Diabetes Treatment.差别成本分担会削弱对联合治疗的治疗依从性：来自糖尿病治疗的证据。

Diabetes Ther. 2021 Aug;12(8):2149-2164. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01098-8. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

Commentary: Patient Cost Sharing and Medical Expenditures for the Elderly.评论：老年人的患者成本分担与医疗支出

Front Pharmacol. 2016 Mar 30;7:73. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00073. eCollection 2016.

Potential impact of co-payment at point of care to influence emergency department utilization.即时自付费用对急诊科利用率的潜在影响。

PeerJ. 2016 Jan 21;4:e1544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1544. eCollection 2016.

Development of a novel, objective measure of health care-related financial burden for U.S. families with children.为美国家庭中育有子女者开发一种全新的、客观衡量与医疗保健相关财务负担的方法。

Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec;49(6):1852-74. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12248. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

When patients have to pay a share of drug costs: effects on frequency of physician visits, hospital admissions and filling of prescriptions.当患者需要承担部分药费时：对就诊频率、住院率和处方配药的影响。

CMAJ. 2005 Nov 22;173(11):1335-40. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.045146.

Effects of cost sharing on care seeking and health status: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.费用分担对就医行为和健康状况的影响：医疗结果研究的结果

Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1889-94. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1889.

A claims data approach to defining an episode of care.一种用于定义一段护理过程的索赔数据方法。

Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):603-21.

[Cost-benefit principle and cost containment].[成本效益原则与成本控制]

Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan 15;93(1):49-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03045042.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验