Basso A, Capitani E, Faglioni P, Spinnler H
Riv Patol Nerv Ment. 1976 Sep-Oct;97(5):277-92.
100 Controls and 200 left hemisphere-damaged patients were sub-divided by means of a Standard Language Battery in 35 non Aphasic patients, 51 Broca's aphasic patients, 85 Wernicke's aphasic patients and 29 global aphasics. They were all submitted to a single letter recognition test. From a parametric statistical work-out of the experimental data, it turned out that global aphasics are by far the most impaired experimental group, even if their performance had been adjusted by co-variance taking into account their more relevant aphasic and neurological disorders. Whilst age and length of illness do not play a significant role in the test performance, this was significant for the educational level (years of schooling) and for the severity of the aphasic disorders (Token Test). The relationship between the above-mentioned independent variables and the letter recognition scores did not change significantly across the experimental groups. The only exception was that the relation between the Token Test and the letter recognition scores proved to be significantly different between Broca's and Global Aphasics. No definite conclusion could be drawn about the outstandingly poor scores of global aphasics, as neither their performance or their I.Q. (W.A.I.S.) seemed to be related to the letter recognition scores (in contrast with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics), nor to the presence of retro-geniculate visual field defects.
100名对照组和200名左半球受损患者通过标准语言测试组合分为35名非失语症患者、51名布罗卡失语症患者、85名韦尼克失语症患者和29名完全性失语症患者。他们都接受了单字母识别测试。从实验数据的参数统计分析来看,结果表明完全性失语症患者是目前受损最严重的实验组,即便他们的表现已通过协方差进行了调整,同时考虑到了他们更相关的失语症和神经疾病。虽然年龄和患病时长在测试表现中不起显著作用,但教育水平(受教育年限)和失语症障碍的严重程度(代币测试)对此有显著影响。上述自变量与字母识别分数之间的关系在各实验组中没有显著变化。唯一的例外是,在布罗卡失语症患者和完全性失语症患者之间,代币测试与字母识别分数之间的关系被证明存在显著差异。关于完全性失语症患者极其糟糕的分数,无法得出明确结论,因为他们的表现或智商(韦氏成人智力量表)似乎既与字母识别分数无关(与布罗卡失语症患者和韦尼克失语症患者不同),也与膝后视野缺损的存在无关。