Parazzini F
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy.
Hum Reprod. 1999 May;14(5):1332-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1332.
In order to analyse the efficacy of resection/ablation of minimal/mild endometriotic lesions for improving fertility, we conducted a randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were women aged </=36 years who were trying to conceive and had a laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis of minimal/mild endometriosis (stage I or II of the revised American Fertility Society classification) and otherwise unexplained infertility for >/=2 years. Eligible women were randomly assigned to resection or ablation of visible endometriosis (54 patients) or diagnostic laparoscopy only (47 patients). After laparoscopy women tried to conceive spontaneously for 1 year (follow-up period). A total of five women withdrew from the study: three for personal reasons, and two were lost to follow-up. Considering 51 women in the resection/ablation and 45 in the no-treatment group who ended the follow-up period, 12 (24%) in the resection/ablation group and 13 (29%) in the no treatment group conceived; the difference was not significant. Two spontaneous abortions were observed in the resection/ablation group and three in the no-treatment one. Thus the 1 year birth rate was 10 out of 51 women (19.6%) in the resection/ablation group and 10 out of 45 women (22.2%) in the no-treatment group. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that ablation of endometriotic lesions markedly improves fertility rates.
为分析切除/消融微小/轻度子宫内膜异位症病灶对提高生育率的疗效,我们开展了一项随机临床试验。符合条件的患者为年龄≤36岁、正在尝试受孕且经腹腔镜确诊为微小/轻度子宫内膜异位症(美国生育协会修订分类的I期或II期)且存在≥2年不明原因不孕的女性。符合条件的女性被随机分配至切除或消融可见子宫内膜异位症组(54例患者)或仅接受诊断性腹腔镜检查组(47例患者)。腹腔镜检查后,女性尝试自然受孕1年(随访期)。共有5名女性退出研究:3名因个人原因退出,2名失访。考虑到51名完成随访期的切除/消融组女性和45名未治疗组女性,切除/消融组有12名(24%)、未治疗组有13名(29%)成功受孕;差异无统计学意义。切除/消融组观察到2例自然流产,未治疗组观察到3例。因此,切除/消融组51名女性中有10名(19.6%)在1年内分娩,未治疗组45名女性中有10名(22.2%)在1年内分娩。总之,本研究结果不支持子宫内膜异位症病灶消融可显著提高生育率这一假设。