Distinguishing between "no evidence of effect" and "evidence of no effect" in randomised controlled trials and other comparisons.
作者信息
Tarnow-Mordi W O, Healy M J
机构信息
Department of Child Health, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, UK.
出版信息
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Mar;80(3):210-1. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.3.210.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Distinguishing between "no evidence of effect" and "evidence of no effect" in randomised controlled trials and other comparisons.在随机对照试验及其他比较中区分“无效应证据”与“无效应的证据”
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Mar;80(3):210-1. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.3.210.
2
[The TIMACS study].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2010 Feb;11(2):96-101.
3
Do dietary restrictions reduce fecal occult blood testing adherence?
J Fam Pract. 2001 Dec;50(12):1081.
4
Endpoints for randomised controlled trials in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):147-51. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
5
A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.一项对随机研究和非随机研究得出的效应量比较的系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154.
6
FSH replaced by low-dose hCG in the late follicular phase versus continued FSH for assisted reproductive techniques.在辅助生殖技术中，卵泡晚期用低剂量人绒毛膜促性腺激素替代促卵泡激素与持续使用促卵泡激素的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD010042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010042.pub2.
7
Uses and abuses of screening tests.筛查试验的用途与滥用
Lancet. 2002 Mar 9;359(9309):881-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07948-5.
8
Randomised controlled trials: inferring significance of treatment effects based on confidence intervals.随机对照试验：基于置信区间推断治疗效果的显著性
BMJ. 2014 Aug 18;349:g5196. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5196.
9
Universal screening for foetal growth restriction.胎儿生长受限的普遍筛查。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;49:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
The ABC of non-inferiority margin setting from indirect comparisons.间接比较中非劣效界值设定的要点
Pharm Stat. 2011 Sep-Oct;10(5):448-53. doi: 10.1002/pst.517. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy for improving adherence to the guideline for prevention of mental ill-health among school personnel in Sweden: a cluster randomized trial.瑞典多方位实施策略对改善学校人员预防心理健康不良指南依从性的效果：一项群组随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01196-6.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对晚期疾病成人患者及其照护者的居家姑息治疗服务的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD007760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007760.pub2.
3
Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.利培酮与其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD006626. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006626.pub2.
4
The INIS Study. International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study: non-specific intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for suspected or proven neonatal sepsis: an international, placebo controlled, multicentre randomised trial.国际新生儿免疫疗法研究（INIS研究）：针对疑似或确诊新生儿败血症的非特异性静脉注射免疫球蛋白疗法：一项国际、安慰剂对照、多中心随机试验
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Dec 8;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-52.
5
Pitfalls in the design and analysis of paediatric clinical trials: a case of a 'failed' multi-centre study, and potential solutions.儿科临床试验设计与分析中的陷阱：以一项“失败”的多中心研究为例及潜在解决方案
Acta Paediatr. 2009 Feb;98(2):385-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01048.x. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
6
Promising stratagems for reducing the burden of neonatal sepsis.减轻新生儿败血症负担的前景策略。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 Sep;83(2):F150-3. doi: 10.1136/fn.83.2.f150.
本文引用的文献
1
A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-96.对1982年至1996年发表于《儿童疾病档案》的随机对照试验的综述。
Arch Dis Child. 1998 Aug;79(2):192-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.2.192.
2
Randomised controlled trials in perinatal medicine: 1. The need for studies of mortality and major morbidity with adequate power.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jul;104(7):763-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12015.x.
3
Clinical trial reporting.临床试验报告。
Lancet. 1996 Sep 28;348(9031):894-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64769-1.
4
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.提高随机对照试验报告的质量。CONSORT声明。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637.
5
Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.评估等效性的试验：严格方法的重要性。
BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):36-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36.
6
Randomised trials and the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Minimum requirements for publication.随机试验与《英国妇产科杂志》。发表的最低要求。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;102(11):849-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10868.x.
7
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.没有证据并不等同于证据不存在。
BMJ. 1995 Aug 19;311(7003):485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485.
8
Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994.产前皮质类固醇疗法：1972年至1994年随机试验的荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):322-35. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90222-8.
Zotero 插件