• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身体意象:运动学模型与动力学模型

Physical imagery: kinematic versus dynamic models.

作者信息

Schwartz D L

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 1999 May;38(3):433-64. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0702.

DOI:10.1006/cogp.1998.0702
PMID:10328859
Abstract

Physical imagery occurs when people imagine one object causing a change to a second object. To make inferences through physical imagery, people must represent information that coordinates the interactions among the imagined objects. The current research contrasts two proposals for how this coordinating information is realized in physical imagery. In the traditional kinematic formulation, imagery transformations are coordinated by geometric information in analog spatial representations. In the dynamic formulation, transformations may also be regulated by analog representations of force and resistance. Four experiments support the dynamic formulation. They show, for example, that without making changes to the spatial properties of a problem, dynamic perceptual information (e.g., torque) and beliefs about physical properties (e. g., viscosity) affect the inferences that people draw through imagery. The studies suggest that physical imagery is not so much an analog of visual perception as it is an analog of physical action. A simple model that represents force as a rate helps explain why inferences can emerge through imagined actions even though people may not know the answer explicitly. It also explains how and when perception, beliefs, and learning can influence physical imagery.

摘要

当人们想象一个物体对另一个物体造成变化时,就会产生物理意象。为了通过物理意象进行推理,人们必须表征协调想象物体间相互作用的信息。当前的研究对比了关于这种协调信息在物理意象中如何实现的两种观点。在传统的运动学表述中,意象转换由模拟空间表征中的几何信息协调。在动态表述中,转换也可能由力和阻力的模拟表征调节。四个实验支持了动态表述。例如,实验表明,在不改变问题空间属性的情况下,动态感知信息(如扭矩)和关于物理属性的信念(如粘性)会影响人们通过意象得出的推理。这些研究表明,物理意象与其说是视觉感知的模拟,不如说是身体动作的模拟。一个将力表示为速率的简单模型有助于解释为什么即使人们可能没有明确的答案,推理也能通过想象的动作产生。它还解释了感知、信念和学习如何以及何时会影响物理意象。

相似文献

1
Physical imagery: kinematic versus dynamic models.身体意象:运动学模型与动力学模型
Cogn Psychol. 1999 May;38(3):433-64. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0702.
2
The experience of force: the role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments.力的体验:触觉力体验在物体运动和相互作用的视觉感知、心理模拟以及与运动相关的判断中的作用。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):589-615. doi: 10.1037/a0025587.
3
Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action.干扰效应表明,在人类动作的心理表征过程中,视觉意象和运动意象发挥着不同的作用。
Cognition. 2005 Apr;95(3):329-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.008. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
4
The relationship between self-reports of imagery and spatial ability.表象的自我报告与空间能力之间的关系。
Br J Psychol. 2003 May;94(Pt 2):245-73. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661912.
5
Area and contrast effects upon perceptual and imagery acuity.面积和对比度对感知及表象敏锐度的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Aug;7(4):825-32.
6
The metrics of spatial distance traversed during mental imagery.在心理意象过程中所穿越的空间距离的度量指标。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1211-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1211.
7
Facilitation of length discrimination using real and imaged context frames.利用真实和虚拟上下文框架促进长度辨别。
Am J Psychol. 1984 Fall;97(3):323-41.
8
[Flexibility of mental representations of spatial information as a function of perspective during learning].
Z Exp Psychol. 2000;47(3):180-94.
9
Spatial forms and mental imagery.空间形式与心理意象。
Cortex. 2009 Nov-Dec;45(10):1229-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
10
What is primed in priming from imagery?从意象中启动时被启动的是什么?
Psychol Res. 2003 May;67(2):71-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0124-3. Epub 2002 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding - the physical world in grounded cognition.抽象概念基础中的不变表示——具身认知中的物理世界。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2558-2580. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
AI, visual imagery, and a case study on the challenges posed by human intelligence tests.人工智能、视觉意象,以及对人类智力测验所带来的挑战的案例研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29390-29397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912335117.
3
A geometric model of defensive peripersonal space.
防御性个人空间的几何模型。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):218-25. doi: 10.1152/jn.00691.2015. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
4
The impetus theory in judgments about object motion: a new perspective.判断物体运动的动力理论:新视角。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1007-28. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0302-2.
5
Spontaneous body movements in spatial cognition.空间认知中的自发身体运动。
Front Psychol. 2012 May 9;3:136. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00136. eCollection 2012.
6
Are things that are hard to physically move also hard to imagine moving?难以物理移动的事物是否也难以想象它们在移动?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):158-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0024-2.
7
When writing impairs reading: letter perception's susceptibility to motor interference.书写干扰阅读时:字母感知对运动干扰的易感性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug;138(3):416-31. doi: 10.1037/a0015836.
8
Fictive motion as cognitive simulation.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1389-400. doi: 10.3758/bf03206329.